L.C.E.C. on 06 May 2008
| Parokki said: To be honest, the only problem I've had with moderation on this site is how it can sometimes be. For example, Leo publicly admitted dodging his extremely deserved 2 month bad, and claimed his "completely reformed" conduct proves how he should be a mod. Nobody raised a finger. Dodgy or missing ban reasons aren't nice, but that's not exactly a huge issue, and easily fixable if there are enough complaints. |
Ugh, I saw that and wondered, "Why is it that people like Leo-J do things like that and get no punishment, not even a warning, yet other people do all sorts of minor things, and get an instant ban with no warning?"
However, I think that a Perma-ban on Leo-J was just a bit unnecessary...
Moderators are suppossed to do exactly what their name says, provide moderation:
mod·er·a·tion 
[mod-uh-rey-shuhn] –noun
| 1. | the quality of being moderate; restraint; avoidance of extremes or excesses; temperance. |
Now, I'm not saying that all mods are bad, Naz and Stof are great, along with many others.
