| theprof00 said: sorry that was rash on my part, noname. I'm not entirely sure what you are, but any answer WILL help scum. ABC do not answer noname's post. unvote: noname2200 |
No. Do not presume that the scum are idiots: if they were, we wouldn't have spent the past days and several hundred posts trying to flush even one of them out. Do not make the mistake that people did in the last game of letting first soft- and then hard-claims go unchallenged. Do not let a suspicious player fester any longer than he has to.
If the claim is true, the important information is already out there (and we're already hamstrung by having it in the hands of a player who throws it out there unnecessarily). Learning more now can only help alleviate our situation, not the scum's; short of believing that between a fifth and a quarter of the players would have overlooked something that we caught onto immediately, the target for the nightkill was obvious.
What I want to know now is why he risked getting lynched without claiming (his lynch was quite possible: he had four actual and seven possible votes on him not too long ago), and why he went and spilled the beans when it was completely unnecessary to do so. Not one bit of this information would help the scum.
