By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Oculus Rift S announced, launching Spring 2019 for $399

BasilZero said:
the-pi-guy said:

I'm mostly disappointed.  It doesn't even quite stack up to the Oculus Quest for the same price, yet largely has fewer features.  This definitely isn't a replacement for the Rift, but it would be a very cool device for my laptop.  

Are there even any worthwhile VR apps that is worth spending this much money on lol?

The Rift or Rift S? Sure!

 



dharh said:
I'll wait for direct brain input/output before I muck around with VR.

If you happen to have some VR Arcade near you, try it out - that's possibly easiest way to see what's all the fuss about.



HoloDust said:
dharh said:
I'll wait for direct brain input/output before I muck around with VR.

If you happen to have some VR Arcade near you, try it out - that's possibly easiest way to see what's all the fuss about.

I've done VR before.  I'm not saying its not immersive, but frankly it's like an uncanny valley type thing.  Like being immersed in motion without feeling the motion.  One of the things I hate about motion controls.  Lifting a rock or hitting a ball or swinging a sword.  The weight is not there and thus it completely throws me off balance.



A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of their first breath to the moment of their last.



BasilZero said:

Look, you don’t pay me to buy what I want to buy

I will buy what I want , when I want and how I want.

 

If something does not provide me a reason to buy it, I simply won’t buy it - I don’t mind shelling out hundreds of dollars to something as long as it provides me a reason to do so, VR has yet shown me a reason to shell out such cash.

I mean I am not gonna shell cash out to play some 2-3 hour Batman demo.

If there is a dedicated VR game that is worth buying , I will pursue it - as of now there’s no point.

 

Its like you are upset that I am not buying a tablet pc like the surface pro when I have a hybrid laptop that has the specs of an actual laptop.

—-

i mean why bring this up all of a sudden? Does it bother you that I can buy stuff? I mean surely you have the will power and hopefully the knowledge and equivalent amount of skill, same as I and most normal people do to say to be able to decide and buy.

Do my lists of game purchases annoy you that much ;p?

—-

And so what if another store exists and doing scummy stuff, this world isn’t perfect - you gotta play the system to get what you want. I don’t believe in boycotts of products or services especially if they are of value that can be used for one reason or another.

And you are right, I don’t care because it’s not my job to care or fix other people’s issues.

I am a consumer, not some industry analyst, developer, stock holder  or accountant. I am not obligated to be loyal to one thing or another.

That's not even a part of the topic. I don't pay you anything, which is besides the point.

Anyone buys what they want, when they want.

 

Then you're selling yourself short if you're willing to pay more for less.

I'm not even remotely upset that you're not buying the headset. It's the fact that you've spent a lot more money combined in a year, each year at that, more so than the headset itself, yet an instant $400 price tag scares you off, that's the only part that actually perplexes me. Nothing to be upset over, just perplexed. 

 

No, it doesn't bother me that you buy an insane amount of stuff (You do tell us this a lot of the time, discord or on here via lists, and have done for years now, not even taking issue with that).

Your lists don't, but I have seen them irk others recently and in the past (I mean, if I annoy some users on here, surely you can't see yourself doing the same with the listing)

 

The world was never perfect to begin with, we can never hope to even reach what we think is perfection, but that doesn't excuse scummy shit from being scummy and wanting it to be done away with. Supporting it just adds to the problem and ignoring/being non-caring, while feeding directly into it does make one a part of that problem, whether they like it or not. You don't believe in them, but ever so many do, and they do actually produce results and show the wrong doings as a result of pointing out wrong that has been done. Voting with your wallet doesn't do jack unless you're a part of the bigger crowd, that I believe is entirely flawed and pointless, but boycotting, actually trying to form a group to stand against an opposing company?, I don't see that as pointless, because it caries direct action and a clear message. Just not buying something doesn't.

No one hired you to be PR or become the guy that "fixes" someone's issues, no one's hired anyone to do that specific sort of thing, but taking actual action as a group can lead to sorting out issues.

I am a consumer just like you, only I believe in action and standing up against scummy practices. I do not want my consumer rights taken away, step by step, and I'm not going to be a non-caring guy, who will eventually bitch when he loses so much in the long-run. I'd rather do something about it now, rather than later. 

 

Also, no, you do not need "loyalty" in order to seek change. That's not how that works. 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

I dont get why they made this.They have just release(or going to, cant quite remember) the Oculus Quest, and this seems to be an (mostly) inferior product.

Why not focus on games and give some years for the tech to evolve, so that you can launch a new gen with actual improvements and features?



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

the-pi-guy said:
Nautilus said:

I dont get why they made this.They have just release(or going to, cant quite remember) the Oculus Quest, and this seems to be an (mostly) inferior product.

Why not focus on games and give some years for the tech to evolve, so that you can launch a new gen with actual improvements and features?

Oculus Quest is a standalone and it seems like that's what they are pushing hard.  

Rift S will play PC games.  It's there to make PC VR more hassle free.  That's why there's no external sensors.  

Still.... it feels like the wrong move.Quest is the move in the right direction, even if it desperately needs more power.They could have used the next 3 or 4 years to develop exclusive games to make their platforms more attractive.And with the passage of time, the tech would evolve enough so that an Oculus Rift 2 would make for an appealing proposition.

Thats my take on it.This just feels weird, even if its tecnically targeting a different audience.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Is there still a mess of cables attached?



Nautilus said:

I dont get why they made this.

To replace the old Rift for PC gamers.

Less production costs than the old version, same price... and more room for further price reductions.