View Post

[EricHiggin]

SpokenTruth said:

EricHiggin said:

Are you saying ST is wrong above? It seemed pretty clear to them that I don't understand Elon, yet do understand Trump, because Trump apparently speaks in a way that might as well be considered another language. Yet somehow I understand both, which wasn't contested.

Do you not see the point I was making?

Incoherent means confusing and unclear. You really think that everyone clearly understood everything Elon was saying in that tweet, and beyond that, the deeper meaning behind it?

It should also be apparent, based not only on how Trump speaks now compared to his past, and how other Presidents have spoken, that it's not coincidence that there's a pattern of shorter sentences with pauses in between, more often than not. It's been made clear by many, especially in this thread, that what a President says is about as meaningful as it get's. It's almost like whoever is President, would want to speak in that type of manner, to give them time to think things through, before saying something that will be seen as extremely unacceptable.

Before you point out what Trump always says is 'unacceptable', if Trump went around saying he thinks it's highly unlikely this is base reality, do you think the media and people in general would say it's because he's a genius, or would he get the same negative treatment he always does?

I can't speak Chinese, but that doesn't make me think that everything Chinese people say is incoherent nonsense. Who's to say it's not though?

Coherent as in properly formulated sentence structure, grammar and syntax with complete thoughts. Not coherent as in the ability to comprehend a complex, intellectual subject. 

It's not just the content itself that is incoherent but the manner in which Trump delivers it. It's disjointed, filled with run-on sentences, non-sequiturs and half thoughts.

I really just had to explain that to someone.

I can't believe you are equating Trump's random incoherent word salad babble with Musk's coherent statement on simulation theory.  

40:15-40:45. There's plenty more if you want to watch it all.

This one is more coherent, but it's full of pauses and useless things that have nothing to do with the point, which he has a hard time getting out.