By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 14 - Game Thread

I did find something interesting from WoW. Let's look back at his first post of the thread. Not very helpful is it? That's fine it was obviously a joke, but then...

Words Of Wisdom said:

c03n3nj0 said:
I am here!

I'm always suspicious of people who post things like this. If all you do is post the minimum amount in the game, basically the "Hi, I'm here" type of post, then you're really not trying to scum hunt or helping the town. And, of course, if you're not helping the town then we may as well lynch you, scum or not.

I think, beyond this point, anyone who makes contentless posts in the thread like this one should be viewed as scummy.

Edited: because there was a lot of empty space 



Around the Network
axumblade said:
hatmoza said:
Here you go WOW, according to your logic, apparently FF and axumblade are guilty of not 'scumhunting' either.
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=3111478

I have posted my suspicions but because I haven't been in the game in a while, I chose the "lynch all lurker" tactic at this moment because I am not as confident as i was when I played before. I'm getting my "legs" back so to speak. Whereas you have done nothing but merely tell people that they are acting like WoW, which isn't 'scumhunting,' which is why WoW called you out on it. 

And you throwing accusations just eggs on the suspicion I have on you. And of course, you are kissing WoW's ass in this game because you know she tends to be capable of reading people easily in these games. So throwing around terms like "WoW imitators" mixed with trying to dodge the finger pointed at you by mentioning FF and me isn't going to win you any friends in this game. 

well excuse me but I tend to get bitchy when I have wow putting me up on a silver platter having everyone analyzing me but ignoring whatever I have to say so yeah, I insulted her tactics because they were biased towards the opinions of the people she/he/it asked.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

I'd like to bring up something else too. I find it interesting the scifi hasn't been discussing at all in a lot of his posts, it almost seems
like he's laying low, see here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111335&page=4&postnum=7

here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111446&page=4&postnum=14

and finally here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111823&page=4&postnum=49

Edit (adding): although this one does seem to be serious, it's barely addressing much.  

And the only post where he even remotely said something was here, and it was a joke (I guess)
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111553&page=4&postnum=29

Why quote big posts if you're not gonna add much anyways?



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

c03n3nj0 said:

I'd like to bring up something else too. I find it interesting the scifi hasn't been discussing at all in a lot of his posts, it almost seems
like he's laying low, see here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111335&page=4&postnum=7

here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111446&page=4&postnum=14

and finally here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111823&page=4&postnum=49

Edit (adding): although this one does seem to be serious, it's barely addressing much.  

And the only post where he even remotely said something was here, and it was a joke (I guess)
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111553&page=4&postnum=29

Why quote big posts if you're not gonna add much anyways?

says a known lurker?



SciFiBoy said:
c03n3nj0 said:

I'd like to bring up something else too. I find it interesting the scifi hasn't been discussing at all in a lot of his posts, it almost seems
like he's laying low, see here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111335&page=4&postnum=7

here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111446&page=4&postnum=14

and finally here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111823&page=4&postnum=49

Edit (adding): although this one does seem to be serious, it's barely addressing much.  

And the only post where he even remotely said something was here, and it was a joke (I guess)
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111553&page=4&postnum=29

Why quote big posts if you're not gonna add much anyways?

says a known lurker?

Erm.... no one has ever called me a lurker before. 

Anyways, I don't consider myself a lurker either. 

And that's all your gonna say? 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

Around the Network

and fyi axumblade, I wasnt calling you out, just using you as an example to put a hole through wow's logic.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

I fail to see the point in "discussing" things that I think are either irrelevant or are going nowhere, I dont think hatmoza is suspicious enough to vote for and I dont think anyone else is either, it is day 1, I fail to see why people are soo desperate to lynch people?

(you even link to a post where I said this already, is it suspicious to make sense?)



c03n3nj0 said:
SciFiBoy said:
c03n3nj0 said:

I'd like to bring up something else too. I find it interesting the scifi hasn't been discussing at all in a lot of his posts, it almost seems
like he's laying low, see here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111335&page=4&postnum=7

here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111446&page=4&postnum=14

and finally here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111823&page=4&postnum=49

Edit (adding): although this one does seem to be serious, it's barely addressing much.  

And the only post where he even remotely said something was here, and it was a joke (I guess)
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111553&page=4&postnum=29

Why quote big posts if you're not gonna add much anyways?

says a known lurker?

And that's all your gonna say?

WTF do you want me to post?

should I make a desperate vote based on little or no real suspicion?

that seems to be what others are doing, forgive me for wanting to play sensibly rather than rashly.



SciFiBoy said:
c03n3nj0 said:

I'd like to bring up something else too. I find it interesting the scifi hasn't been discussing at all in a lot of his posts, it almost seems
like he's laying low, see here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111335&page=4&postnum=7

here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111446&page=4&postnum=14

and finally here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111823&page=4&postnum=49

Edit (adding): although this one does seem to be serious, it's barely addressing much.  

And the only post where he even remotely said something was here, and it was a joke (I guess)
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111553&page=4&postnum=29

Why quote big posts if you're not gonna add much anyways?

says a known lurker?

See these are the kinds of posts that M0j0 is talking about 



SciFiBoy said:
c03n3nj0 said:
SciFiBoy said:
c03n3nj0 said:

I'd like to bring up something else too. I find it interesting the scifi hasn't been discussing at all in a lot of his posts, it almost seems
like he's laying low, see here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111335&page=4&postnum=7

here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111446&page=4&postnum=14

and finally here:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111823&page=4&postnum=49

Edit (adding): although this one does seem to be serious, it's barely addressing much.  

And the only post where he even remotely said something was here, and it was a joke (I guess)
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3111553&page=4&postnum=29

Why quote big posts if you're not gonna add much anyways?

says a known lurker?

And that's all your gonna say?

WTF do you want me to post?

should I make a desperate vote based on little or no real suspicion?

that seems to be what others are doing, forgive me for wanting to play sensibly rather than rashly.

Well, no, I'm not saying you should randomly vote. But contributing more helps.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the third one it sounded to me like you were just gonna say that and be done with it. 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."