By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 14 - Game Thread

hatmoza on 01 February 2010
axumblade said:
Final-Fan said:
Dgc1808 said:
hatmoza said:
lol at all the WOW imitators.

I still stand by what I said yesterday. We always complain and suffer for letting lurkers stick around too long. If we are going to lynch anyone today, it might as well be a lurker. I'm not saying that today's back and forths are not going to be useful in the future. Depending on who comes up scum and comparing who they got into arguments day one can somewhat narrow down our choices . But for now (day one) this information is useless, unless someone is stupid enough to slip up like Dgc did a few games back.

So are you saying we should just lynch a Lurker and not talk?

We should talk long enough to figure out who the Lurkers are in this game, and then lynch one of them.  

Sounds like a plan.  

ok then. I'm still salty that wow didn't include me in her group therapy sessions though -_-



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Around the Network
c03n3nj0 on 01 February 2010

^ It doesn't sound bad I guess.

As long as we don't start complainin' about the day taking too long and end up voting wily nilly.

Assuming no one lurks.



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

trangentspree on 01 February 2010
Final-Fan said:
sabby_e17 said:
Final-Fan said:
Why, specifically, did you FoS trangent?  I was starting to look at him a little funny myself, but didn't have enough to FoS and certainly not anything specific enough to play "20 Questions" with.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?post=3110972&page=13&postnum=5

I see.  
Yeah, that's a decent reason -- but I think it's pretty funny that you're jumping all over him for jumping all over Dgc, when IMO you both did it with about as little provocation.   

I don't agree that I jumped on Dgc. It wasn't like I just sprung out of nowhere, I was just trying to keep a discussion going and get people to make meaningful posts.



trangentspree on 01 February 2010

Aren't we hurting our chances if we pick on a lurker and they turn out to be pro-town? Or does it not matter if we lose a lurker that's pro-town?



SuperAdrianK on 01 February 2010
trangentspree said:
Aren't we hurting our chances if we pick on a lurker and they turn out to be pro-town? Or does it not matter if we lose a lurker that's pro-town?


you know, this could happen to me ...




              

Around the Network
c03n3nj0 on 01 February 2010
trangentspree said:
Aren't we hurting our chances if we pick on a lurker and they turn out to be pro-town? Or does it not matter if we lose a lurker that's pro-town?

I'm sure if they start posting they won't end up getting lynched.

 

Come to think of it, this'll take forever. -_- 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

dsister44 on 01 February 2010

Nothing has been going on all day. Then I leave and this thread explodes :-/

LestatDark hasn't posted much at all



trangentspree on 01 February 2010
axumblade said:
trangentspree said:
Aren't we hurting our chances if we pick on a lurker and they turn out to be pro-town? Or does it not matter if we lose a lurker that's pro-town?

Not really. 

In many cases, the lurkers tend to be mafia members who are laying low. In a lot of cases, it's recommended that the lurkers are killed because they refuse to contribute to the game itself, therefore they aren't doing much if anything for the game. 

In the worst case scenario though we could lose a lot of pro-towns during the night, and if on top of that we've just killed another pro-town, things could get very bad very quickly.

Personally I'm still not convinced a 'no lynch' first night isn't the best way to go about this. Especially now that there have been some interesting moments in the discussion that we can look back on when we find out what happens.



hatmoza on 01 February 2010
axumblade said:
hatmoza said:
axumblade said:
Final-Fan said:
Dgc1808 said:
hatmoza said:
lol at all the WOW imitators.

I still stand by what I said yesterday. We always complain and suffer for letting lurkers stick around too long. If we are going to lynch anyone today, it might as well be a lurker. I'm not saying that today's back and forths are not going to be useful in the future. Depending on who comes up scum and comparing who they got into arguments day one can somewhat narrow down our choices . But for now (day one) this information is useless, unless someone is stupid enough to slip up like Dgc did a few games back.

So are you saying we should just lynch a Lurker and not talk?

We should talk long enough to figure out who the Lurkers are in this game, and then lynch one of them.  

Sounds like a plan.  

ok then. I'm still salty that wow didn't include me in her group therapy sessions though -_-

Or we could all vote for hatmoza and see if he's lying abou being protown. :P 

I'm pro-town dammit >_< 

look at the innocence of my avatar!



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

hatmoza on 01 February 2010

I love how our plan already smoked out some lurkers



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson