By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 14 - Game Thread

dsister44 on 01 February 2010
sabby_e17 said:
dsister44 said:

He really wasn't defending himself. He really only pointed out the obvious. 

 

Though Sabby's post was kind of interesting 


Interesting in what way?

I can't explain it. It is just interesting...



Around the Network
c03n3nj0 on 01 February 2010
Falcon095 said:
c03n3nj0 said:
Honestly, I don't care for No Lynch or Lynch, the discussion is what matters.

Although, by the way this is going it'll probably end up at No Lynch anyways.

So you don't care if somebody is lynched or not?

Not in day 1 at least.

Like I said, it's more important to discuss. We'll get more out of discussing, and we don't really have to pick someone to kill if we still don't get many leads. 



 Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."                               

trangentspree on 01 February 2010
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?


For saying "There's no need to be so defensive". What do you expect him to do if he's being suspected?

@bolded: You're contradicting yourself there aren't you? My suspision has risen quite a bit.

I don't see the contradiction there. He was being defensive because he was complaining about being singled out - I wasn't even casting suspicion at him when I said that, I was just trying to get him to post something more useful for discussion.

I do seem to have provoked quite a large reaction from you in doing so, however.



sabby_e17 on 01 February 2010
dsister44 said:
sabby_e17 said:
dsister44 said:

He really wasn't defending himself. He really only pointed out the obvious. 

 

Though Sabby's post was kind of interesting 


Interesting in what way?

I can't explain it. It is just interesting...


Interesting in a good or bad way?




sabby_e17 on 01 February 2010
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?


For saying "There's no need to be so defensive". What do you expect him to do if he's being suspected?

@bolded: You're contradicting yourself there aren't you? My suspision has risen quite a bit.

I don't see the contradiction there. He was being defensive because he was complaining about being singled out - I wasn't even casting suspicion at him when I said that, I was just trying to get him to post something more useful for discussion.

I do seem to have provoked quite a large reaction from you in doing so, however.

So you wanted him to start a "useful" discussion instead of him defending himself? I belive a useful discussion started a while back.

@Bolded: Good for you. It might/may have started a "useful" discussion.




Around the Network
trangentspree on 01 February 2010
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?


For saying "There's no need to be so defensive". What do you expect him to do if he's being suspected?

@bolded: You're contradicting yourself there aren't you? My suspision has risen quite a bit.

I don't see the contradiction there. He was being defensive because he was complaining about being singled out - I wasn't even casting suspicion at him when I said that, I was just trying to get him to post something more useful for discussion.

I do seem to have provoked quite a large reaction from you in doing so, however.

So you wanted him to start a "useful" discussion instead of him defending himself? I belive a useful discussion started a while back.

@Bolded: Good for you. It might/may have started a "useful" discussion.

Things have been dead here all day. You have chosen to omit the fact that I asked him a question.

I still don't understand why you're so quick to point the finger at me.



makingmusic476 on 01 February 2010
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?

He probably got a little jumpy because of Zexen's post:

I don't think there's enough reason to lynch either yet, but I'd like to hear these two talk, to see who could be more lynchable (of course, keeping eyes open for whatever new thing surfaces)

Which reads to me like:

"You two are the most suspicious, so we'll lynch whichever one of you we deem more suspicious."

...despite neither having done anything worthy of a lynch.

And looking back at past games, dgc probably fears people may bandwagon him for silly reasons, which has caused innocent lynchings at least a couple of times a game (more like four times the first round I played, though we did have issues with an insane cop that round).



sabby_e17 on 01 February 2010
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?


For saying "There's no need to be so defensive". What do you expect him to do if he's being suspected?

@bolded: You're contradicting yourself there aren't you? My suspision has risen quite a bit.

I don't see the contradiction there. He was being defensive because he was complaining about being singled out - I wasn't even casting suspicion at him when I said that, I was just trying to get him to post something more useful for discussion.

I do seem to have provoked quite a large reaction from you in doing so, however.

So you wanted him to start a "useful" discussion instead of him defending himself? I belive a useful discussion started a while back.

@Bolded: Good for you. It might/may have started a "useful" discussion.

Things have been dead here all day. You have chosen to omit the fact that I asked him a question.

I still don't understand why you're so quick to point the finger at me.


Since I've been here, things have been quite lively.

And if you don't understand why I Fosed you, thats your problem. Perhaps you should read the posts again, the reasoning is definitely in there.




trangentspree on 01 February 2010
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?


For saying "There's no need to be so defensive". What do you expect him to do if he's being suspected?

@bolded: You're contradicting yourself there aren't you? My suspision has risen quite a bit.

I don't see the contradiction there. He was being defensive because he was complaining about being singled out - I wasn't even casting suspicion at him when I said that, I was just trying to get him to post something more useful for discussion.

I do seem to have provoked quite a large reaction from you in doing so, however.

So you wanted him to start a "useful" discussion instead of him defending himself? I belive a useful discussion started a while back.

@Bolded: Good for you. It might/may have started a "useful" discussion.

Things have been dead here all day. You have chosen to omit the fact that I asked him a question.

I still don't understand why you're so quick to point the finger at me.


Since I've been here, things have been quite lively.

And if you don't understand why I Fosed you, thats your problem. Perhaps you should read the posts again, the reasoning is definitely in there.

@bolded: I agree with that much anyway.

So do you think we should lynch someone today? Who would you suggest?



sabby_e17 on 01 February 2010
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
sabby_e17 said:
trangentspree said:
Dgc1808 said:
Hmmm... I'm being suspected for trying to NOT lurk and voting the most suspicious person in the thread thus far aside from myself.

This is cool.

There's no need to be so defensive. People are just going on what little there is to discuss so far. Do you think we should lynch someone today or vote no lynch?


He's not being so defensive...is he supposed to give some weak defence if people are suspecting him?

Fos: trangentspree

He was defending himself, and while there is nothing wrong with that I don't see why anyone should complain about being targetted for suspicion so early in the game when there is so little to go on.

Which leads me to asking you why have you FoS me?


For saying "There's no need to be so defensive". What do you expect him to do if he's being suspected?

@bolded: You're contradicting yourself there aren't you? My suspision has risen quite a bit.

I don't see the contradiction there. He was being defensive because he was complaining about being singled out - I wasn't even casting suspicion at him when I said that, I was just trying to get him to post something more useful for discussion.

I do seem to have provoked quite a large reaction from you in doing so, however.

So you wanted him to start a "useful" discussion instead of him defending himself? I belive a useful discussion started a while back.

@Bolded: Good for you. It might/may have started a "useful" discussion.

Things have been dead here all day. You have chosen to omit the fact that I asked him a question.

I still don't understand why you're so quick to point the finger at me.


Since I've been here, things have been quite lively.

And if you don't understand why I Fosed you, thats your problem. Perhaps you should read the posts again, the reasoning is definitely in there.

@bolded: I agree with that much anyway.

So do you think we should lynch someone today? Who would you suggest?

Trying to change the subject?

Have you figured out why I Fosed you?

And to answer your question, I'm not sure who should be lynched atm.