trashleg said: well i just reread the last couple of pages and i'd thought that dsister (you) announced WoW and zexen as innnocent. I just read it now and i see that it was KingFate, not WoW.
which means that since WoW has not been investigated, i can still legitimately believe that he has been acting scummy. vote:WoW |
The problem with this is that I'm voting you out of the logical proposition that you have a 69% chance of being scum while you are revenge voting with a broad statement of "been acting scummy" without providing evidence. If you had an actual case and honestly believed I had "been acting scummy" then you would be able to quote those posts and put together a logical case against me. There are two problems with that though. Revenge votes are, by definition, not logical because they're out of revenge. Someone votes you and you vote them back. The other problem is that I'm not scum so it's really hard to make a case against me that amounts to more than... well... nothing.
Meanwhile, let's look at your posts:
Here and here you ask to be "filled in." You know what? If you're scumhunting then you don't need to be filled in. You go back and reread those posts looking for clues. You look for scum tells and make your own judgments. Of course, if you're scum then you're not going to do that in the first place so why bother.
Here you ask a lot of bizarre questions. Why are there so many deaths? It shows on the table. What is the Jailkeeper? You know where the wiki is. You weren't born yesterday. Either you're lazy or scum and lazy. Either way, you're not producing useful content or scum hunting.
Here you come at me asking about the possibility of multiple families... when you were so very confused only a short while ago? That's not odd at all. In fact, it's pretty logical if you assume that you're mafia and already know there are multiple families by virtue of a family name.
Here you say you really don't know what to think. A classic scum tell is not taking a position. If you take a strong position on someone that turns up pro-town, that bothers people. So scum will often try to be as low key as possible while still chirping in with a vote at key times. And of course it's always hard to know what to think when you don't read the thread (by virtue of scum not caring about scum hunting).
Here you waffle more and still refuse to take a stance on anything.
Here you say you did read Day 1? I thought you weren't going to though. People needed to "fill you in." Or were you just lying before?
I love this post. You sent in no night action PM. Very carefully worded. I guess your mafia partners sent it in for you.
You see all that above? It's called "making a case." It's what you do when you earnestly believe someone is scum. "i can still legitimately believe that <WoW> has been acting scummy" is not a case. It is a revenge vote and nothing more.