By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 14 - Game Thread

Falcon hasn't posted since the start of Day Three. His last post was on the 11th. It is now the 20th.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Around the Network
ArkZero said:
theRepublic said:
theRepublic said:
ArkZero and KingFate are both similar to Corleone Mafia member Lestatdark. They are all lurkers who didn't have a vote on Day Two and voted for Hatmoza on Day One.

No one has commented on this yet.

This day is going nowhere so far, and we have to do something.  What do you guys think about picking out a suspicious lurker and lynching them?

And what if the lurkers are townies??? Its better to vote for someone who is suspicious enough than to lynch a random lurker.

Scum use lurking as a method to hide.  That makes it more likely to hit scum if we lynch lurkers.  It also has the added bonus of being incentive for people to be active in the game.  Lurking townies do nothing to help the town.  They don't scum hunt which makes it easier for scum to not scum hunt, they don't post which makes it easier for scum to not post, and they are an extra body which lowers the odds to lynching scum.

Scum are actively bad for the town.  They try and force mis-lynches, and they have night actions which hurt the town.  Lurking townies are passively bad for the town for the reasons I listed above.  So why not lynch someone who is known to be passively bad, and has a decent chance of being actively bad, since scum tend to lurk anyway?

I already pointed out that both you and KingFate are somewhat suspicious for your voting patterns and lurking.  As for post content, I haven't been suspicious of KingFate.  For you, I've pointed out before that I feel suspicious about the things you post.  And it seems to me like the only time you post is when someone mentions you.  As if the only thing you are interested in is defending yourself.  Real townies would have other interests.

FoS: ArkZero



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Since this game is in desperate need of a boost, I guess I have no choice but to set a deadline for this day. So day 3 will end tomorrow around 7pm EST.



Signature goes here!

If there's a deadline, we should at least pick someone so the day doesn't end on No Lynch. I think trangentspree id going to be modkilled soon, so it's not necessary to go after him. I agree to lynch a lurker in this case, it's obvious the game isn't going forward




I still think my first vote for j0 is a better vote but at this rate the day will end in a no lynch and that would not be a good thing.  So I guess lynching a lurker,  which everyone is technically doing right now, is an option I have no issues with.

unvote

Vote: SuperAdrianK



Around the Network
theRepublic said:
ArkZero said:
theRepublic said:
theRepublic said:
ArkZero and KingFate are both similar to Corleone Mafia member Lestatdark. They are all lurkers who didn't have a vote on Day Two and voted for Hatmoza on Day One.

No one has commented on this yet.

This day is going nowhere so far, and we have to do something.  What do you guys think about picking out a suspicious lurker and lynching them?

And what if the lurkers are townies??? Its better to vote for someone who is suspicious enough than to lynch a random lurker.

Scum use lurking as a method to hide.  That makes it more likely to hit scum if we lynch lurkers.  It also has the added bonus of being incentive for people to be active in the game.  Lurking townies do nothing to help the town.  They don't scum hunt which makes it easier for scum to not scum hunt, they don't post which makes it easier for scum to not post, and they are an extra body which lowers the odds to lynching scum.

Scum are actively bad for the town.  They try and force mis-lynches, and they have night actions which hurt the town.  Lurking townies are passively bad for the town for the reasons I listed above.  So why not lynch someone who is known to be passively bad, and has a decent chance of being actively bad, since scum tend to lurk anyway?

I already pointed out that both you and KingFate are somewhat suspicious for your voting patterns and lurking.  As for post content, I haven't been suspicious of KingFate.  For you, I've pointed out before that I feel suspicious about the things you post.  And it seems to me like the only time you post is when someone mentions you.  As if the only thing you are interested in is defending yourself.  Real townies would have other interests.

FoS: ArkZero

Well, if you check the few posts I've made, I have posted when people didnt mention me and if someone accusses me I have to defend myself or I will get lynched (thats common sense).

I could vote for a lurker, but that doesnt feel right when I have been lurking in the whole game. 



Given that there's not much time left in the day before the deadline, it won't be easy to have a discussion on who to lynch, and I agree SAK has been lurking a lot, therefore I don't have any problem with him lynched. Trangent should be modkilled also

Vote: SuperAdrianK




Vetteman94 said:

I still think my first vote for j0 is a better vote but at this rate the day will end in a no lynch and that would not be a good thing.  So I guess lynching a lurker,  which everyone is technically doing right now, is an option I have no issues with.

unvote

Vote: SuperAdrianK

So you unvote j0 who you were supposedly suspicious of to vote SuperAdrianK, someone you're not even suspicious of, without explanation.

vote: Vetteman94


So everyone, how about we all lynch Vetteman94 for bandwagoning with no reason?



At this rate TruckOSaurus is just going to end up dropping a nuke on this game, maybe taking a couple of the most talkative ones to start over on Earth ... if they can avoid the Lurkons.



Tag (courtesy of fkusumot): "Please feel free -- nay, I encourage you -- to offer rebuttal."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
My advice to fanboys: Brag about stuff that's true, not about stuff that's false. Predict stuff that's likely, not stuff that's unlikely. You will be happier, and we will be happier.

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." - Sen. Pat Moynihan
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The old smileys: ; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for , let me know!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I have the most epic death scene ever in VGChartz Mafia.  Thanks WordsofWisdom! 

Final-Fan said:
At this rate TruckOSaurus is just going to end up dropping a nuke on this game, maybe taking a couple of the most talkative ones to start over on Earth ... if they can avoid the Lurkons.

The thought has crossed my mind.



Signature goes here!