Dont lynch me, I wont lurk anymore.
theRepublic said:
No one has commented on this yet. This day is going nowhere so far, and we have to do something. What do you guys think about picking out a suspicious lurker and lynching them? |
It's kinda hard to make a similarity because lesta was simply bored of the game. So not voting was probably just 'cause of apathy...
Now, I guess we just have to get an explanation outta kingfate or arkzero on their reasons....
And it looks like ArkZero is here.
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."
theRepublic said:
No one has commented on this yet. This day is going nowhere so far, and we have to do something. What do you guys think about picking out a suspicious lurker and lynching them? |
And what if the lurkers are townies??? Its better to vote for someone who is suspicious enough than to lynch a random lurker.
theRepublic said:
Like WoW misunderstood you, I think you have misunderstood Axumblade. Axumblade is not saying your question is a set-up. He is saying that the mafia letting WoW live is a set-up to make WoW look quilty. Since WoW is usually an early target, just merely living a long time looks suspicious. For the first bold, Axumblade is referring to the 'first to say X did X' type of logic. For the second bold, the way it worked last game was that only one member of the mafia had to send the night action. The others didn't have to send night action PMs. |
ah, so axumblade is very subtly suggesting that i have something to do with the fact that WoW is still alive.
if i was mafia, i would be targetting WoW as soon as i knew the doctor was protecting the cop.then surely he would be dead by now? i reckon it must be a very foolish mafia who would let WoW survive, because even if he was in the other family from them (and therefore they thought he was innocent), him being dead is better for them than him being alive just to shift suspicion.
i already gave my defenses for night 1, i only got whatever information from trucks i absolutely needed, and i started reading the thread when i joined the game. like i said, that was late night 1 (almost day 2) and it took me ages. work that out for yourself
vote:whatever lurker you guys choose to lynch. im sick of how slow this game is ¬_¬
c03n3nj0 said:
But it'll be worse to lynch just for the hell of it. |
i always thought so too but
A) we can't scumhunt if there's no-one here to dig the dirt on
B) they really aren't contributing
C) we've been playing for what feels like a week now, we've got 1200 posts and its only day 2.
I think trangentspree will be modkilled soon, anyway, he hasn't logged in since 4 days ago, and posted here since a week ago. It's not worth wasting a lynch on him
trashleg said:
i always thought so too but A) we can't scumhunt if there's no-one here to dig the dirt on B) they really aren't contributing C) we've been playing for what feels like a week now, we've got 1200 posts and its only day 2. |
I guess you have a point, ArlZero never answered me either...
And it's day 3.
I support a modkill for trangentspree, but he was posting quite a bit before, so maybe he'll be back soon? Ket's give him another day or so.
Tag (Courtesy of Fkusumot) "If I'm posting in this thread then it's probally a spam thread."