Demotruk said:
gekkokamen said:
DaBuddahN said:
numonex said:
Fanboy meltdown on VGC. Damage control by some fans. But will there be more sales adjustments made? |
Yes, there are fanboy meltdowns. But it's much more than that! It's about reliability of VGC data now. 2mil 360's in shelves?? Is that normal? Ps3 overtracked by 1.1mil despite Sony seeming to be amazingly happy with sales? If you look closely, most data was adjusted from "Others" region. Which, if you think about it, is the one region where VGC really doesn't have a larger organization to compare its data with (as far as I know). For example, when NPD and MediaCreate usually release their data, VGC adjusts accordingly if they have to. But in Others region, VGC does not have that. So basically, from what I can see, Others region is pure guesswork?? I'm confused.
|
so yeah, what exactly do these adjustments mean? do they mean this site can't rely on their own numbers and have to be constantly readjusting to other sources' data? And how do they readjust exactly? do they just take a couple of months and shave off some of their numbers until the match they "real numbers" ? Isn't that admitting this site numbers are bullshit? There shouldn't be any "adjustments" at all, this looks bad, very bad.
|
All this means is that vgchartz is open about it's limitations. It's a small tracking service, the size of the samples they use (and the huge population of sold video games) leave a potential for error. The other trackers have more resources available to them, and thus have less potential for error, but they make mistakes sometimes too. VGChartz is open and honest about this, so they make adjustments when they find themselves to have been innaccurate.
As long as people understand that vgchartz is a more limited tracker than the others, there shouldn't be a problem. The numbers are still correct most of the time, and as such are useful and interesting enough. It has the advantage however of being free and transparent compared to the others.
|
now there's something, as per ioi, adjustments were done to previous estimates up to 3-4 years back. now, if that is the case, wouldn't it mean that vgc's numbers have been way off all this time for the adjuted countries/region?
if i understood correctly, not all countries in EU were adjusted, just a some countries etc. so from there, we can say vgc is very close to what actual sales is to some countries and regions but suck at others. i'm guessing there aren't a lot of source data from these countries/locations, hence the inacurate estimates.
