Reality needs no justification or excuse, Im just presenting my explanation. Dont delude yourself thinking that I have a hidden agenda on a GAMING MESSAGE BOARD where I attend to pass the time or that the views that I present in my post arent my own.

Unlike the complainers I Like the WII for what it has and I see Great Games 1st and 3rd party. But you guys wont stop complaining because imaginary game X doesnt get a main entry on the WII.

Enjoy your  great games and forget about the rest.

Ah.

Well, turnabout is fair play...

"Reality needs no justification or excuse"

Claims of what wouldn't sell if it was Wii exclusive is not reality, especially when the first major third party exclusive proved it false.

And using some PC series to disprove the Wii audience is just wrong. WoW wouldn't work on the HD sytems either.

You didn't use reality. You used BS that's been debunked for a long time. That's why you looked like a shill. It just came across as fake as that PSP site.

And no HD user is asking for publishers to bring it to HD consoles :P

"And no HD user is asking for publishers to bring it to HD consoles :P"

If any 360, PS3, or Wii owners wanted the game, they would still be off. The structure just wouldn't work on those.

Nope. we have RE4 WII, did it sold better than RE5?  Nope. why because the audience that cares about those games care for them for very specific reason, gamers dont follow the games blindly they follow the meaning behing the name/brand.

WOW can work on the PS3/360 the only reason is not there is because Blizzard has targeted the PC audience with their game, thus if you want to play wow you get a PC, and if Blizzard were to abandon the PC audience and went console exclusive the PC audience would find another MMO on the PC to play.

WII owners need to get this publishers and developers when they make a game they have a target audience and depending were this audience is bigger they develop the game for. Do you think my grandma wants to play RE5? nope, but she likes WII Bowling. Do you think My little sister wants to play MetalGear? nope but she likes Imaginez petz babiez.

Unfortunely for the core WII gamers and Nintendo Fans of old the WII audience likes good and bad games alike, but the games they like arent the same you like and the games they buy by the gazillions are WII MUSIC, WII FIT, WII PLAY WII WII. That is the bigger share of the WII Owners and they are quite happy with the games they are getting, and there are many core games on the WII that are good and great that are Ignored amd Neglected while you guys complain abou the fact that imaginary game X doesnt get a main entry on the WII.

ON a CONTEN DRIVEN INDUSTRY. CONTENT IS KING.  if you arent happy with the content you get on the current system you have just follow the content where is at if you can of course.

P.S Dont talk to me about the WII audience and how many consoles it has sold because if that were a valid reason all games would go to DS/PSP/PC/IPHONE. as they all have sold more consoles than the WII, or Maybe they should make all games exclusive to the PS2 is the console that has sold the most and keeps on selling. However Nobody  complains about the fact those systems arent getting imaginary game X  main entry. WII forums dwellers have these idiotic sense of entitlement that is pathetic how they turn every thread and topic into a cesspool of complaints.

Those first two years were when I was the most satisfied with our Wii.  Then came the disastrous E3 2008 presentation of Wii Music cowbell players and Animal Crossing being touted as the big core game release of the holiday season (because of the multi-player and Wii Speak, features which were 10 years out of date by then).  I can recall as that being the moment when I realized Nintendo had left me, and I had to get one or both HD systems for my needs.  We did that by the end of the year, and Wii gaming has fallen way down in our house from what it once used to be.  This is all pure speculation, but had Nintendo instead invested its money that year into making a few big budget and truly innovative games (say a real new IP FPS, not the continuation of Metroid Prime they had already made), many people like me would have held off the HD switch.  I am sure with all their talent and money, Nintendo could have made a serious, big budget game that was significantly better than the port of CoD:W@W or the Conduit, and had a good chance of making it hit big.  This would have showed the third parties that there was money to be made in new IP AAA games on the Wii.  And possibly some of the current bigger HD projects would have switched over to the Wii by now.  Nintendo had to be the first, because they only developed for the Wii, had the necessary resources, and had the incentive to make this happen.  They instead dropped the ball, decided to focus on more profitable, but low profile casual games or continuation of proven old IPs, and left it up to the third parties to take all the risk.

You can claim that Nintendo did follow this model in the N64, GCN cycles, and the third parties did not follow.  The big flaw there is that N64 and GCN were not the market leaders, and Nintendo never really went all out with them like Microsoft did with their XBox.  Microsoft lost a lot of money in the short term, but set themselves up to take on Sony then next generation. Nintendo instead went with maximizing profits, and doing what they already knew. Good for them, bad for the fanbase.

What's so bs about that comment ?

See many HD owners asking for publishers to release fitness games on HD consoles ?

Nope, those that want those kind of games purchase a Wii...

Correct, you dont see topics being highjacked with people complaining about that  or creating topics to diss blizzard etc. I.e WII Forums fighter bitter tears.

Correct, if those types of games are the ones you want  you should follow the content and stop destroying the forums topics and threads.