By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Will MW2 for 360 Surpass Halo 3 Sales?

Mummelmann on 10 January 2010
Aidman said:
MW2 360 will outsell Halo 3 no doubt why ? because of MW 360 leg I mean MW the first one look at its leg you'll notice that MW2 will beat Halo 3 in sale and of course :

NSMB Wii will beat them all combined (MW2 360 + MW2 PS3 + Halo 3) HAHAHA.

First off; no it won't. You think it will move 27-28 million?

Second; what does that have to do with anything?



Around the Network
c0rd on 10 January 2010
Mummelmann said:
Aidman said:
MW2 360 will outsell Halo 3 no doubt why ? because of MW 360 leg I mean MW the first one look at its leg you'll notice that MW2 will beat Halo 3 in sale and of course :

NSMB Wii will beat them all combined (MW2 360 + MW2 PS3 + Halo 3) HAHAHA.

First off; no it won't. You think it will move 27-28 million?

Second; what does that have to do with anything?

Actually, I do think it'll move 27-28 million. Mario Kart looks like it's on its way, don't see why NSMB Wii couldn't manage it.

Problem is, MW2 + Halo 3 will end up closer to 32-34 million. That may be pushing it... (though not impossible)


Yeah, offtopic. Sorry.



BladeOfGod on 10 January 2010
sabby_e17 said:
It'll easily outsell Halo 3 although I don't want it to.

I don't think Halo 3 will sell past 12 million however MW2 passing 15 million is possible.

why not?



sabby_e17 on 10 January 2010
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
It'll easily outsell Halo 3 although I don't want it to.

I don't think Halo 3 will sell past 12 million however MW2 passing 15 million is possible.

why not?


The maps are shit, guns are way too strong. There's no point using sub-machine guns when you have the assualt rifles which are so much better. Killstreaks are unfair and there's so much fricking cover everywhere that players camp forever.

CoD4 was a much better game. Maps had cover but not too much, guns were nicely varied and the killstreaks were fare.

 




BladeOfGod on 10 January 2010
sabby_e17 said:
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
It'll easily outsell Halo 3 although I don't want it to.

I don't think Halo 3 will sell past 12 million however MW2 passing 15 million is possible.

why not?


The maps are shit,much better than COD4s IMO guns are way too strong.They are the same like in COD4 There's no point using sub-machine guns when you have the assualt rifles which are so much better.agree on that Killstreaks are unfairno, they are not.( except the nuke ) you can use them too you know, if you dont suck. and there's so much fricking cover everywhere that players camp forever.so be carefull when your playing. dont just run around the map shooting people and going somewhere where your not supposed to. and when you're not sure, use a grande, or even better, a radar


CoD4 was a much better game. Maps had cover but not too much which is bad , guns were nicely varied and the killstreaks were fare.agree on that

 

 



Around the Network
iHuGi on 10 January 2010
sabby_e17 said:
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
It'll easily outsell Halo 3 although I don't want it to.

I don't think Halo 3 will sell past 12 million however MW2 passing 15 million is possible.

why not?


The maps are shit, guns are way too strong. There's no point using sub-machine guns when you have the assualt rifles which are so much better. Killstreaks are unfair and there's so much fricking cover everywhere that players camp forever.

CoD4 was a much better game. Maps had cover but not too much, guns were nicely varied and the killstreaks were fare.

 

THIS !! 100% AGREE!



sabby_e17 on 10 January 2010
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
It'll easily outsell Halo 3 although I don't want it to.

I don't think Halo 3 will sell past 12 million however MW2 passing 15 million is possible.

why not?


The maps are shit,much better than COD4s IMO guns are way too strong.They are the same like in COD4 There's no point using sub-machine guns when you have the assualt rifles which are so much better.agree on that Killstreaks are unfairno, they are not.( except the nuke ) you can use them too you know, if you dont suck. and there's so much fricking cover everywhere that players camp forever.so be carefull when your playing. dont just run around the map shooting people and going somewhere where your not supposed to. and when you're not sure, use a grande, or even better, a radar


CoD4 was a much better game. Maps had cover but not too much which is bad , guns were nicely varied and the killstreaks were fare.agree on that

 

 


1st of all, I don't suck. I just stopped playing because it's so damn boring.

I know I can use the killstreaks but when you have chopper gunner, the other team don't stand a chance, it's game over for them. Another thing is the dual Akimbo's are fucking overpowered.

When I play, 90% of the time it's camper v camper. Since there's so many buildings, people hide inside them like a rat.

And I don't see how not having much cover is bad??? It make the game very balanced and you don't have noobs peeping out of their little hiding space to take someone out.

Edit: This is derailing the thread, so it's best if it stops now.




JaggedSac on 10 January 2010

If anyone doubts the power of Halo. Look here:

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=97611&page=1&str=531156754#



BladeOfGod on 11 January 2010
sabby_e17 said:
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
BladeOfGod said:
sabby_e17 said:
It'll easily outsell Halo 3 although I don't want it to.

I don't think Halo 3 will sell past 12 million however MW2 passing 15 million is possible.

why not?


The maps are shit,much better than COD4s IMO guns are way too strong.They are the same like in COD4 There's no point using sub-machine guns when you have the assualt rifles which are so much better.agree on that Killstreaks are unfairno, they are not.( except the nuke ) you can use them too you know, if you dont suck. and there's so much fricking cover everywhere that players camp forever.so be carefull when your playing. dont just run around the map shooting people and going somewhere where your not supposed to. and when you're not sure, use a grande, or even better, a radar


CoD4 was a much better game. Maps had cover but not too much which is bad , guns were nicely varied and the killstreaks were fare.agree on that

 

 


1st of all, I don't suckwhere have i said that?. I just stopped playing because it's so damn boring.yet, COD4 is better with the same gameplay

I know I can use the killstreaks but when you have chopper gunner, the other team don't stand a chanceyou can take out the chopper gunner you know,, it's game over for them. Another thing is the dual Akimbo's are fucking overpowered.agree on that

When I play, 90% of the time it's camper v camperwell, what type of games are you playing? go play team deathmatch or free for all. dont play capture the flag, toooo many campers there. Since there's so many buildings, people hide inside them like a rat.well, if someone kills you from the building, go back to that building and clear it out. thats what i always do if a camper kills me.

And I don't see how not having much cover is bad??? It make the game very balanced and you don't have noobs peeping out of their little hiding space to take someone out.its much more realistic and it takes some strategy and thinking

Edit: This is derailing the thread, so it's best if it stops now.

 



Kenoid on 12 January 2010

Well, before a rant starts, I believe that Halo: reach won't sell better than Halo 3, period. Reason due to strong marketing for Halo 3, and unless they come up with something innovative, Reach won't move sales



                                  

                                       That's Gordon Freeman in "Real-Life"