By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - More Capcom PR: More Quality Less quantity for the Wii LOL at Sega

famousringo said:
SaviorX said:
famousringo said:
SaviorX said:

Talk about putting your foot in your mouth...

 

With less Wii games from all the big 3rd parties, they will definitely see less money than they have last year. I wonder what they will do on the other consoles in the meantime. This provides the other small teams an opportunity to capitalize on the 3rd party vacancies (but I doubt that will happen).

 

Other than that, I don't really know what to say. What he said was stupid. Why would they say this with a whole bunch of their games yet to release on this system they are cutting part of their support from......unbelievable. As for Sega, do not criticize them. Mario & Sonic 1 sold 11.5 million, BIGGER THAN HALO 3, their highest-selling published title ever! The second one passed 3.75 million after a few months, and still has sales coming.

Less revenues, perhaps, but if fewer SKUs reduces costs faster than it reduces revenues, publishers come out ahead. As jlauro suggested, it's even possible that fewer SKUs might increase revenue as upmarket Wii games draw themselves out of competing with every budget title launched on the Wii.

Yes, that does also open up space for smaller developers at the bottom trying to fight their way in. It all sounds good to me.

Alright, that sounds good in practice. Do you know any companies that have done that recently so I can get an example of it (besides Capcom)?

I think you mean it sounds good in theory. Nobody has really put it into practice yet, except maybe EA Sports, so I'll let you know how it goes.

I wrote the word theory, but used practice instead, because I didn't want to discredit your educated thought by assuming it was theory. Theory implies you stated it but have never seen it actually work. I assume you've seen a case where you know it worked, hence why you brought it up, so I changed the word.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Around the Network
Ari_Gold said:
he does have a point, if mario where to be a capcom fighting game, its sales would increase tenthfold.


Or Link.   Remember Soul Calibur 4?



 

DUH. Mega Man 3D, either like Zelda or Mario Galaxy. You guys already have a popular IP, go with it.



The Carnival of Shadows - Folk Punk from Asbury Park, New Jersey

http://www.thecarnivalofshadows.com 


Good. Their 2010 already looks way better than any previous year (Tatsunoko Vs. Capcom, Mega Man 10, Monster Hunter TRI, Sengoku Basara Samurai Heroes), I'm eager to see what else is in store.



Somebody giv me Nintendo vs. Capcom

I DEMAND NINTENDO vs. CAPCOM



Around the Network

Megaman Legends reception was actually better than X's. ^_^

Either way prehaps it would be wise for Capcom to just toss in the towel, call it a day push more for the HD systems. =D

I mean real wise.



I'm Unamerica and you can too.

The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread: 



The Hunt Begins 4/20/2010 =D

Khuutra said:
Somebody giv me Nintendo vs. Capcom

I DEMAND NINTENDO vs. CAPCOM


Start a petition.     I can't see Capcom not seeing the $$$ in such a offering and it wouldn't even be expensive to make.



 

SaviorX said:
famousringo said:
SaviorX said:
famousringo said:

Less revenues, perhaps, but if fewer SKUs reduces costs faster than it reduces revenues, publishers come out ahead. As jlauro suggested, it's even possible that fewer SKUs might increase revenue as upmarket Wii games draw themselves out of competing with every budget title launched on the Wii.

Yes, that does also open up space for smaller developers at the bottom trying to fight their way in. It all sounds good to me.

Alright, that sounds good in practice. Do you know any companies that have done that recently so I can get an example of it (besides Capcom)?

I think you mean it sounds good in theory. Nobody has really put it into practice yet, except maybe EA Sports, so I'll let you know how it goes.

I wrote the word theory, but used practice instead, because I didn't want to discredit your educated thought by assuming it was theory. Theory implies you stated it but have never seen it actually work. I assume you've seen a case where you know it worked, hence why you brought it up, so I changed the word.

LOL, you give me too much credit. There's a reason why I used words like 'if,' 'possible,' and 'might' in that post. Nothing is ever certain. I was more outlining how Capcom's plan might succeed than I was asserting that it would succeed.

EA Sports has put out several hits on the Wii without skimping on investment, though I'm sure they're disappointed in the performance of Madden and FIFA on the platform. Music games have done well, as has Call of Duty. Monster Hunter 3 was a solid success in Japan. Red Steel is the only other "event-size" 3rd party game I can think of, but it has exceptional circumstances on its side as a launch game. Everything else is niche or spinoff.

No, the Wii's reaction to third party "event-size" games is largely untested. There are a few games coming this year that will give us a better idea, starting with Red Steel 2.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Ari_Gold said:
he does have a point, if mario where to be a capcom fighting game, its sales would increase tenthfold.

I'm not sure about that. Not all mario titles are great sellers. Mario is missing and Mario teaches typing are two examples. Why doesn't this guy suggest that Capcom invest more into their games and remake Resident Evil 2 for the Wii. Capcom has stated on a number of occasions that Resident Evil titles sell well on Nintendo systems. Heck, they could even develop a third person shooter for the Wii. There are lots of games that they could make for the Wii that will sell well but their talented developers are focused on the HD systems. Therefore they will continue to Reap what they Sow.

 

With all this talk about fewer Wii games being developed by them, I wonder will there be fewer games for HD consoles since Bionic Commando bombed at retail?



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

patjuan32 said:
Ari_Gold said:
he does have a point, if mario where to be a capcom fighting game, its sales would increase tenthfold.

I'm not sure about that. Not all mario titles are great sellers. Mario is missing and Mario teaches typing are two examples. Why doesn't this guy suggest that Capcom invest more into their games and remake Resident Evil 2 for the Wii. Capcom has stated on a number of occasions that Resident Evil titles sell well on Nintendo systems. Heck, they could even develop a third person shooter for the Wii. There are lots of games that they could make for the Wii that will sell well but their talented developers are focused on the HD systems. Therefore they will continue to Reap what they Sow.

 

With all this talk about fewer Wii games being developed by them, I wonder will there be fewer games for HD consoles since Bionic Commando bombed at retail?


Don't know about Capcom but that is the way the industry is moving.    Focusing only on the heavy hitters, dropping the AA titles and new IPs.   Expect fewer titles all around.