I just thought about that now with the recent statement:

"The system locates body parts to within a 4-centimetre cube, says Kipman. That's far less precise than lab-based systems or the millimetre precision of Hollywood motion capture."

Is a 4 centimetre cube accuracy enough to detect your fingers motions as promised by Microsoft on past E3? 

IF NOT, what exactly does this implies?

If you think carefully about that, you can imagine yourself moving your fingers INSIDE a confined 4 centimetre cube. But Natal can still detect it?

Single Poll:  Let's count the Ben Harper Fans  

Link! please

certainly won't see you 'pulling the trigger'. or frankly, will have problem seeing you 'hitting the gas' (you can surely kiss tapping-the-gas-pedal-gently goodbye)

Vgchaartz news, what else?

yet all the things I heard about it with Burnout. I didn't hear that 

Ben Harper is not very good...

although Burnout isn't exactly a game that needs finess. ;)

Meh, nevermid. I'm not in the mood for this 

http://g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/696082/microsoft-natal-hands-on-impressions.html

It has been known for quite a while now that Natal cannot see fingers. Man, if people are going to post stuff, at least make it new or interesting.

But there's a 3D tech demo of that ball game and the carachter on screen moves the fingers...

I though this was already some established alpha-work with fingers, and now it was removed!