and fyi vetteman, I think you are my target for the night.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
and fyi vetteman, I think you are my target for the night.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
Final-Fan said: OMG I just lost my whole post. The upshot: if dsister is an SK and gets roleblocked N1, a good way to stop SAK from outing him after N2 reveals an SK kill would be to get in front of it by claiming another role. But that does leave a very potent question of why other people are getting blocked. Hypotheses that don't involve dsister lying: 1: My summoned spirits don't directly target dsister as such, only surrounding him waiting to ambush OTHERS who target him. 2: Another roleblocker. 3: WoW forgot. |
Not to make myself look guilty, but if one of us had been blocked then we should have gotten a PM. Though this correspond with 3
Final-Fan said: WTF I guess instead of losign my post, as I thought, my browser somehow opened a new window of its own accord. " To expand on that, let's say dsister is the dragon and gets blocked . He knows that if he kills the NEXT night, he invites SAK to say, "hey, I blocked dsister Night One, he could be the dragon!" So he decides to get out in front of it by claiming some OTHER role. Now it's risky because he has to fake having an ability, but probably better than what was going to happen before. I'm not claiming psychic powers, but that seems pretty damn plausible to me. " P.S. Have to go AFK for a bit. |
So you are saying that I some how managed to guess that SAK also had healing abilities? >.> I must be psychic
The fact that dsister44 claimed to have gained both the power to protect and curse BEFORE SAK claimed to be a Red Mage who could protect and curse, really makes me doubt dsister44 could have made that up unless like nordlead said they are both mafia.
Signature goes here!
dsister44 said:
SAK didn't block Falcon. He has to use a different ability every night. I could have sworn I remember him saying this at one point yesterday
|
all the restrictions I've seen posted are can't kill/protect two nights in a row. So while SAK must alternate abilities, he could block two nights in a row if he chose too. As for the claim, I guess I should go back and make sure I'm right
well if dsister is telling the truth, that means FF is lying about his roleclaim.
I'm pretty sure we have a 50/50 situation going on here. One of them is likely to be mafia, because one of them has to be lying.
I am the black sheep "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson
About SAK, I'm positive he protected someone on night 2 because he spent day 3 asking who he should block. Had he blocked on night 2, he would have been able to protect on night 3.
Signature goes here!
hatmoza said: and fyi vetteman, I think you are my target for the night. |
Thats cool
nordlead said:
all the restrictions I've seen posted are can't kill/protect two nights in a row. So while SAK must alternate abilities, he could block two nights in a row if he chose too. As for the claim, I guess I should go back and make sure I'm right |
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=3029063
It is easy if the person only has 500 posts altogether
dsister44 said:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=3029063 It is easy if the person only has 500 posts altogether |
lol, you beat me to it. I was going to go specifically through his history to find it rather than reading this thread too
So scratch the Falcon involved with dsister/SAK theory. Those two are still tied together though.