I've met lots of people here on vgchartz who think so. When the japanese covers clearly say Squaresoft:


Edit: links kinda suck, but I hope you can see the pics.
I've met lots of people here on vgchartz who think so. When the japanese covers clearly say Squaresoft:


Edit: links kinda suck, but I hope you can see the pics.
- Wasteland - The Mission.
Ok, i'll clarify to everyone if that finish this nonsense threads...
Square Co.
-Final Fantasy I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, also X-2
Enix
-Dragon Quest I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII
Square-Enix
-Final Fantasy XII, XIII, XIV, also the other titles from the Fabula Nova Crystalis
-Dragon Quest VIII, IX, X
If there's still doubt about the FF/DQ series or another series (as KH, SO, VP, etc.), i would recommend to make a thread about a list of all SE titles before the merger and after the merger....
I'm pretty sure it says "enix" in my x2 title screen :p
regardless of who made it. It was a pretty big dissapointment in my opinion.
Final Fantasy X-2 was published by Square in Japan but Square-Enix in NA and Europe. The merger happened in between.
Is it really relevant?
Square and Square-Enix are basically the same company.
Wada was in charge, they kept the square and enix teams seperate and the Enix boss despite being part of the bigger, healthier and more profitable company decided to let Wada take over and just retire.
Now if something SE did that was being blamed on Enix, I could see the point... since the Enix higher ups were pushed out of the way for the square guys for some reason.
But whether it was Square or Square-Enix who made a certain game is pointless since they would of made those games anyway.

| Kasz216 said: Is it really relevant? Square and Square-Enix are basically the same company. Wada was in charge, they kept the square and enix teams seperate and the Enix boss despite being part of the bigger, healthier and more profitable company decided to let Wada take over and just retire. Now if something SE did that was being blamed on Enix, I could see the point... since the Enix higher ups were pushed out of the way for the square guys for some reason. But whether it was Square or Square-Enix who made a certain game is pointless since they would of made those games anyway. |
Enix was more profitable than Squaresoft? I didn't know it, since Squaresoft games had more WW appeal and Enix was a really Japan-Centric publisher.
Answering thread:
FFX-2 in a finacial way were easy money, they could re-use lot of stuff from X, the engine was already there, the team were already used to PS2 development. In a artistic way it was a try to give Yuna a happy ending.
FFXI was a shot in use FF name to enter in the MMO market.
Enix didn't only do Video Games. They had a lot (and still have as SE now) in Anime and Manga industry.
Square Soft + Enix = Square Enix.
So all games made by Square Soft and Enix now was made by Square Enix.
What are your point???
| Kasz216 said: Is it really relevant? Square and Square-Enix are basically the same company. Wada was in charge, they kept the square and enix teams seperate and the Enix boss despite being part of the bigger, healthier and more profitable company decided to let Wada take over and just retire. Now if something SE did that was being blamed on Enix, I could see the point... since the Enix higher ups were pushed out of the way for the square guys for some reason. But whether it was Square or Square-Enix who made a certain game is pointless since they would of made those games anyway. |
Squaresoft was much better than Enix.They have become greedy after it.