the one reviewing Zero is some Ryan Clements and the reviewer for REmake was Matt Casamasawhatever. So different reviewers have different opinions  but i do agree to have that much of a gap its stupid indeed.

would have been better if matt reviewed it, probbly would have scored the same or possibly 0.2 or so below.

"Pre-rendered backgrounds occasionally look nice but are ultimately dull. Let's just say you can tell that Resident Evil Zero used to be a GameCube game."

Well that's just retarded. They are downplaying the graphic capabilities of the Gamecube. I doubt they complained Resident Evil 4 on the Wii looks like a Gamecube game.

Indeed. Despite the fact that I think Zero sucks, it is a really pretty game to this day. The diversity of environments is great too. Sadly the plot is boring and the pacing is awful. Even RE3 kicks the shit out of this in the fun department. But a 4.5/10 is unfair- the game still beats the vast majority of the crap marketed as survival horror last gen. Perhaps this guy should get a job a GameInformer where he can ascribe random scores based on his dickish angle.

God Capcom i want a real resident evil game not the Railshooter, not ports, i don't want any of those tablescrap games, i want a brand new resident Evil IP for wii where you can actually control your character.

maybe they're finding it difficult to make an open world non liner resident evil?

There has to be a reason these devs stick to on rails ... knowing how much the userbase hates them ..

Rail shooters take a lot of flak from what I think is a pretty small minority. They seemed to sell quite well until recently.

Meh its a port what was really expected? Didnt stop me from picking up this game =)

I actually thought they were going to do this when the Wii was released...but we got Umbrella Chronicles instead. Really tho, if they do this, i might just praise them.