Ps3 said:
Fab_GS said:
Ps3 said:
Fab_GS said:
Ps3 said:
letsdance said: I'm 23 bub... and I still know its a joke. Especially to the bar scene AND people of my age group around the city. |
It's no joke. I'm almost the same age as you and I don't know anyone around my age that listens to the beatles, Pink Floyd, AC/DC or music you claim that good. The only people I can think of were a small little group of kids in high school.
|
Didn't you say that music from the 20's - 50's were real music (aka good). ZOMG that means you're 90?!  Again success/popularity doesn't equal quality. You should know that by now.
|
No, I just don't think music that involved drugs or about yellow submarines are real music... 90% of the music sounded the same and it was straight up boring and involved all the same themes.
|
We are generalizing now eh? The 60's and 70's (let's call them the golden ages ) had a variety of different theme, music now talk about two things only, love and sex. AWESOME!!!
If you don't listen to music from the golden ages, how the hell would you know that they sounded the same? Pfff Taylor Swift fans are becoming worse than Christina's fans now.
|
At least songs from the 20's had all different instruments... It seems like every song in the 70's had the same melody same beat everything... just different lyrics. BORING
|
Oh wow...
Let me just say this.
David Bowie, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Steven Tyler, Mick Jagger, Billy Joel, Ect Ect are all still active and are all legends and will have a career much longer then taylor Swift. Go through all of these singers and you will hear the differences... if not you are crazy.