Isn't this thread obvious flame bait? It also asks us to spam by giving one word answers with no substance. Therefore this thread should be locked and this guy banned. He's always out to start stuff against MS, Xbox 360, or Natal.

To answer your question, OP: NO!

I'm curious to see how people would say PSN is better than LIVE. It's great that it is free and all, but that really isn't a feature.

The 360 set of socially better and a is a little bit more user friendly, other than that they pretty much work the same.

i don't have a 360 or have never played it so my answer defaults to yes

No

I don't understand the point of bringing price into this. We don't judge games this way. In fact I don't think we judge much of anything this way. Is free TV better than paid TV? Is The Dark Knight a better movie on a Saturday night for $10.50 than it is on a Sunday matinee at $6.00? Is a Toyota a better car than a BMW? Is Dial-Up better than Cable?

Also price is relative. If you don't pay for your gaming habits, does price matter? Is Mass Effect a better game at $20 than it was at $60? Is Uncharted 2 a better game if it was a Christmas present and didn't cost you a cent? Or to combine the two, does Mass Effect get an extra boost in your likelihood to enjoy it more than Uncharted 2 if you bought Mass Effect at $20 and Uncharted 2 at $60?

I would say Live is still slightly better than PSN, the fact that you can join a party with all of your friends and then launch into a game cooperativly and all chat with each other makes it so in my opinion.

Si

No

Have both, and while there is nothing wrong with the PSN (because it is free), I don't see how any one could say it was equivalent to Live, much less superior.

Live's party system and "integrated interface" makes it alot better than PSN in my eyes, but PSN is very good.

Once it gets cross game chat, I can say they are almost the same

Pure ignorance leaves me to say yes, but I would assume Live is better and hope it is since you're shelling out some good money for it.