Feylic said:
and yet they have. Hmm weird. |
well just keep telling yourself that, but it doesn't change what is and what is not.
Count @ Sapient
PSN is already superior to LIVE?
YES - 35 votes
NO - 38 votes
You people need to clarify in your posts yes or no. There is people talking about the two services aspects and at the end don't refer which they prefer.
And last night the thread was in some sort of blackhole or something, I was seeing negative posts on it in the frontpage.
NO
But this will probably be the last year I pay for live. For me it just is not worth the extra cash for whats free on PSN.
What the..
No.
Yes.
| MikeB said: Wouldn't it be great if on PCs you and all your online gaming friends would require to subscribe to a Microsoft or Valve service to be able to play online? Your "piss poor" or non-sheep friends will be nicely filtered out of the picture. While were at it maybe PC games shouldn't be using dedicated servers anymore. So battles can be kept small and extra challenging due to bad performance, like small scale 4 x 4 Gears battles with its short single player campaign? /sarcasm |
Gears 2 was 5 v5, funnily enough isn't that the same as Uncharted 2 (a game released in 2009)?
Time to call back some old friends if you're going to start with your pathetic FUD campaigns MikeB
Cueil said:
|
Just saying that the 360 is built around Live doesn't make Live better. What does it do that makes it so much better? nothing.
Look at your friends list for each service then write down which is bigger, that about sums up this thread in a nutshell. A service you use more often must in my opinion be a better solution for you personally.
Answer to OP:
No.
Xbox Live is way better than PSN.
Owners of both systems will tell you.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
