Baroque_Dude said:
So, you know the future... ¿¬_¬ |
When it comes to the quality of network services and the software to support it, you don't need a crystal ball to know sony is simply not cappable of putting out a product that is comprable to Live.
scat398 said:
When it comes to the quality of network services and the software to support it, you don't need a crystal ball to know sony is simply not cappable of putting out a product that is comprable to Live. |
and yet they have. Hmm weird.
It's good enough considering that it's free. But Live is somehow more than the sum of its parts. Seeing somebody's avatar, profile, playing 1 vs. 100, and such --Live just feels more alive. I can't explain it. Live is a community. PSN is a service.
| Pharaoh said: Can we say 60 player online for Resistance 2? Can we say 256 players for MAG, even in the Beta? 32 for Warhawk? Killzone 32 players? And for my connection, which is just a regular wireless connection, there isn't a performance issue when playing online. Halo it has 16 players. Gears - 10 players. Need I say more? I dare someone to respond with something debunking this. Because you can't. |
....
Can you say type of game(map size/grphx/dedicated servers by the publisher/dev) and developer sets the amount to play at one time.
And honestly that has nothing to do with live or psn service....and if you think so...have you played the Final Fantasy mmo on ps3/pc/360*thousands of players geez...**and omgz on 360...ps3...*....so again your statment = jackshit.
Oh..almost forgot frontlines fuel of war had some odd 32...that was on 360 aswell...or the 1943 battlefield acrade game that has 24 at once...so..yeah...come up with something else.
Free isn't better nor is a service that is added to a system... Live is the center of the 360 not some added on feature at the last moment when Sony figures out that online is really cool
Feylic said:
and yet they have. Hmm weird. |
PSN is the very core of the PS3? No it's not... it will never be able to touch Live because of this... the 360 was build around Live... this is the diffrence that cannot be overcome ever on the PS3. No amount of arguing will ever make up for the lack of integration.
Yes.
No way I'm paying to be able to play online. And I might even not play...
I haven't paid for playing online on PC in late 90's and/or early 2000 and I won't now. Except MMO's.
"And yet, I've realized that maybe living a "decent" life means you won't ever have a "good" life."
No,
Live is better, but it is getting closer as time goes on.
̶3̶R̶D̶ 2ND! Place has never been so sweet.
hmmm i havnt used live enough to say,but im 99 percent sure that live is not 50 dollars better than psn,and i am very content with psn so ill go with psn
"They will know heghan belongs to the helghast"
"England expects that everyman will do his duty"
"we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender"
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
