zexen_lowe said:
I don't know if the old Substance part is still applicable. Given, I don't know moderation history, thus I can't follow whether some users got a warning, but I don't think I've seen any moderations for
-"Similarly, do not reply to other posters with "you're wrong." Explain why you disagree, and perhaps point to the correct answer."
and
-"No "In Before The Lock" (IBTL) posts. Repeat offenders will be warned, and disciplinary action will be taken if those warnings are not heeded."
Dunno if I'm horribly wrong (something that's possible), but it's just a suggestion
Other than that, the new set of rules looks great and much more akin to the moderating rules mods use
|
I've always reported these, and have been assured that moderations were done as a result of reporting them.
There is nothing more annoying than taking time to write out a post than to have someone "LOL Couldn't be more wrong".
Those posts get me frustrated and make me want to flame them, so instead, I just report them, while at the same time offering them the chance to explain themselves. If they want to seriously take part in the discussion and they have something to contribute, they will. But they broke the rules. Rules that I myself have come to tread very carefully around.
Moderations are guardrails IMO.