Munkeh111 said:
Akvod said:
Munkeh111 said:
Crap article. The campaign is great, and it moves so quickly you don't really think about the story. It is a very fast paced and a very intense campaign, that is really only there to prepare you for the multiplayer.
When you have created arguably the best multiplayer in any game, why do you want a radical change? The added killstreaks and other customisations are a fantastic addition, and the maps are great too. The isn't much change to the gameplay, but that would be A BAD THING
Don't get me wrong, I will get probably Battlefield Bad Company 2, just not first day and that is only because of Final Fantasy XIII's proximity. It is a vehicular based shooter, so a direct comparison is not really valid |
I don't like how you imply that vehicles are the center piece of Bad Company. Its not. Both infantry and vehicles are crucial, a balance is needed. You go gung ho with a tank? You'll get hammered with RPGs and get C4ed from behind in the ensuing chaos. Go assault an enemy base allone with a chopper? You'll get shot down. You need ground support AND air support. You need to have standard infantry AND snipers AND anti-tank units.
|
I don't mean that it is just a vehicle game, but I mean that having vehicles massively changes the way that things go and they do play a large part
|
And thats why its better IMO =D
Lacking vehicles is like lacking classes.
