By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Row over plan to use unsold meat for power

mrstickball said:
Jagged -

There's a yes and no answer to that.

The best answer to qualms about Nuclear power is given by Russel Brand - a former anti-nuclear activist and very popular 'green' author. He is about as environmentally-friendly as one can get, but he is now a proponent of nuclear power as a way to be green while meeting challenging economic factors.

You can watch his fantastic 1hr presentation on the green movement and nuclear power here:
http://fora.tv/2009/10/09/Stewart_Brand_Rethinking_Green#fullprogram

Cool, I will have to check out that video.  But I hope it isn't the Russel Brand I am thinking of(actor/comedian). 



Around the Network
mrstickball said:
I was actually thinking about the similarity of this with the activists in America that hate nuclear power, despite the fact it's one of the most environmentally-friendly power sources available. My point is that many of these activists will oppose something not based on logic, but merely on passion.

Can't argue with that. Logic doesn't motivate like passion does. Environmentalists, animal rights activists, tea-baggers... they all have some valid points to make, but reason and compromise take a back seat because it's the simplicity of strident radicalism that grabs headlines and puts boots on the protest line.

I wonder which is a bigger factor in turning people away from the process: The tedium of a reasoned debate or the divisiveness of a radical shouting match. Seems like there's no way to win there.

@ JaggedSac

If you accept the idea of anthropogenic global warming, the risk of a couple Chernobyls pales in comparison to the risk of worldwide climate change. The idea of civilization giving up on cheap energy altogether just isn't going to happen at this point, so I'll take the one that doesn't have a chance of provoking a global mass extinction event or massive starvation and geopolitical unrest. Nuclear might not be the best solution, but it's a compromise that reduces risks and I don't think stalling for a better deal is pragmatic.



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Stewart Brand, my apologies.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

So what do they propose be done with the meat? Like a funeral or something?

But really, serious question (the first one).



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

mrstickball said:
Stewart Brand, my apologies.

I know, I saw in the link.  I was just busting your chops.

 

I am all for nuclear power.  I was just saying that I see where some people can be wary of it.



Around the Network

I don't think any logical thinking person would protest against nuclear power.

...

I think this is a good idea (energy from meat), don't get me wrong, I think it should be done. I just find it creepy too.



I don't find it creepy... but even if I did I'd still support it.

There are many things I find creepy but should be done. Like autopsies.



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

As a vegetarian (well, pescitarian), I'd like to posit the following:

Fuck the animals, I want cheap energy.



its only a little bit creepy.

i mean, they have to get rid of the meat one way or another anyway, if they incinerate it its still gonna release energy so they're as well to harness the energy clean fuel, woohoo! only dirty in the blood-on-your-hands way!



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.
SamuelRSmith said:
As a vegetarian (well, pescitarian), I'd like to posit the following:

Fuck the animals, I want cheap energy.

Thats an entirely different issue.