You can go to gamespot and get the critic scores. This one is for Heavenly Sword.
http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/heavenlysword/review.html?mode=web&om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary;theysay

Great idea, but you can't have a story category for multiplayer games, I would say these should be the categories

Graphics

Sound

Gameplay

Lasting Appeal

Story adds to the gameplay, and IGN uses presentation, but I am not entirely sure what this really means 

I think this site's value prosition is in the predictions league, games / console sales, sales news, and forums.

The games database is nice, but it is only a "tack on" feature unless you intend on becoming bigger then metacritic and gamerankings. I think user game reviews are fine, but they should be critiqued by mods so that you don't get in some sort of legal battle when, one of the big three sues you because one of the competitors wrote a crappy review on your site and then posted it through N4G or some sort of other aggregator site... Gamespot has a really good user review area with pie charts and review text...

I think more time should be spent on the predictions league and being able to run crazy queries like comparing game sales histories to each other on graphs over time based on hardware consoles available to sell to and such...

The sales related news is pretty limited on this site. It would be great if more effort was given to post news about things that will effect sales and analyst comments and such.

Also, the predictions league is a great interactive feature. It provides people a way to put up or shut up about their thoughts on sales and creates an ongoing visitation requirement if you want to be in the top predictors...

Also, the forums are where you have the best results I think right now... They are strongly enforced and require most people to be polite at the very least. But, it would also be nice to have a better forum structure that allows you to find forums a bit easier. This would reduce the number of threads and redundancy... (I can't tell you how many threads talked about 40 Gb PS lately... Too many... Same with Halo3 when it was releasing... And Metroid Prime 3, And now Ratchet & Clank review and sales threads are out of control.)

And Finally what about RSS feeds to tell you when forums are updated or new sales data is in?

All would probably add more value then trying to out do other review sites...

Just copy the numbers directly from Gamerankings and Metacritic.  There is no need to triplicate the work.

I can't imagine they would have a problem with it, but in case they do, you could link to each one and I'm sure that would be acceptable, as people could go to those sites to see the individual review scores.

I say there are two options. You can reuse the gamerankings data (Easy and boring) or we could be more descriminating. I know that gamerankings weighs scores but I would like a composite of 5 or so sites. No fanboys sites or console specific stuff. Let it be more difficult with lower scores. I think this owuld provide a different function than gamerankings. Posters often quote only a couple sources and it would be valuable to have that data on the site.

Famitsu

Edge

IGN

jeux france

We don't just take any sales data, why should we accept any review?

@dshumm, you need more than that. I would certainly include gamespot, eurogamer and gamespy

Gamingrankings and Metacritics should be the two top ones IMO.

Famitsu is not a valuable review source. They are way too positive in their reviews and shouldn't be counted in an average. I suggest using just Gamerankings. They filter the crap sites better than Metacritic does, and they give relatively accurate reviews.

Whatever is chosen is fine with me. However, if you include only a handful of professional sites/mags, do not include Game Informer. You should only include sources with some integrity, which GI lacks.