zexen_lowe said:
nordlead said:
Brilliant job flushing out the cop. You have a newb player who you just forced a role claim, and we have a poisoner along with other killing roles (obviously the mafia). If you don't want to play follow the cop, then you shouldn't have forced a role claim, as that is the same thing. In fact, why should you be capable of forcing a role claim. If you want to force them, then you should admit your own role, in full as that is only fair for what you are asking. With only a innocent result the cop claim is risky. So now, rather than playing "follow the cop" we are playing "follow the zexen forcing everyone to role claim" but for all we know you are anti-town seeking out the best power roles so you can kill/block.
|
Nobody told you or anyone to follow me (I know you in particular didn't vote for SH), it's not my fault that everyone here sees that someone has one vote against and the vote for that one. Again, what did you want me to do. He was getting lynched. Did you want me to just let him die without anything that could help us? Because that was what was happening, I repeat, he had a lot of votes against and the lynch was pretty close to him. I don't want anyone to play the "follow the zexen", I just do what I think it's best for the town, and that includes breaking the mold. And if everyone did that, I seriously think we'd do better.
I think you should ask why everyone piled on Smoked so hastily after I voted for him, and what was everyone planning on doing when he finally came to the thread, or even better, if they even were planning to let him lynched without him getting a chance to defend himself.
And I guess that since you're so tired of the "follow the zexen" game we're supposedly playing, you have a better idea of what to do, don't you?
Besides, I cleared you of being poisoner, doesn't mean I've cleared you of being mafia. I wouldn't exactly trust what plan you had, anyways
|
First off, smoked hostage just started posting. You could have easily asked him to defend himself and see where that led first rather than rushing straight into a full role claim as the only valid defense. We may have been close to a lynch but when people vote on lurkers they typically switch votes once they see them participate. Again, we didn't need to jump straight from 1 post of the suspect to full role claim. Instead of creating active chatter and accusations we went straight from lynch to "oh, he is the cop" which doesn't help the town at all. If we could have interrogated him instead maybe a mafia would have slipped and made a false accusation. Once a insatisfactory defense is found, then force a full role claim as a last defense, not as a first. If you are driving the game (asking for claims) you are essentially asking the town to follow you. Leaders are leaders by action, not by request, so yes, you lead the town to vote smoked.
I'm not shocked that people piled on, and I have my reasons to suspect them, but most followed the general guidlines of keeping the game active. To each of the people who jumped on smoked I will do my own research, but I don't have a reason to question them yet. We'll see what happens next. Also, no one really defended smoked, so that also helps out his pro-town role as a non-mafia and non-mason. I asked people to be reasonable, but I think I was the only one who even said anything. If you want me to FoS someone who joined the bandwagon, my best would be j0 due to being 4th on the bandwagon, and unvoting without any additional comment. Seems like an under-the-radar kind of thing to me.
Finally, you said so yourself that I could still be anti-town even though I'm not the poisoner. As for trusting my plan, I have yet to claim to have one other than to observe people and vote people who make stupid mistakes and either hurt the town or indicate that they are mafia.