By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - (Crazy Rumor) Wii 2 Specs

Please!!  Nintendo would never pay thier competitors a royalty fee.  Blue ray is an unecessary format (with the now standard motion controll, bigger hard drives and fast loading transport cards {memory cards}) is the direction Next Gen will be going.  Nintendo made low end definition titles outsell anything on those inferior selling (makie it look pretty but nobody buys)HD machines.  HD-yes, blue ray-NO!!



Around the Network

I think we're taking the "Blu-Ray" thing too literally. Wii 2 will use Blu-Ray, yes, but it will use Blu-Ray just like Wii uses DVD. Basically, you're going to have a proprietary multilayer Blue Laser disc with 25 GB per layer, that Nintendo is going to call the "[Insert console name here] optical disc"



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

2010 already? roprietary blu-ray disc and such sounds believeable, but 2010 is too early for a new console.

I still bet on a Q4 2011 release, unless Nintendo feels menaced by Natal or such.



 

 

 

 

 

shams said:

Complete bullshit, to the n^n'th extreme.

Nintendo would never use BluRay - and don't care about movie playback. If they did, they would earn Sony a lot of money (they make nothing off movies).

Nintendo would never do a worldwide simultaneous release. Its a sure way to lose money.

Trade-in? Why? What happens to all the software on the Wii?

Would a BluRay player be compatible with existing Wii discs? GC discs? I think not.

Still making massive $$ on the Wii, with Zelda, Metroid, Galaxy II (etc) all scheduled to release next year (or later) on the Wii. Release a new console? Why?

100% BS.

First of all Blu Ray isn't just Sony format. Sony doesn't own format completely. It has been said several times.

And Nintendo chooses format which is best for them. If that format is created by Sony then they choose it even if it earns money for Sony. Companies don't hate each other, if co-operation is best way to make money then they do it. Proof: Toshiba makes almost all Cell prosessors for Sony (Sony sold those factories for Toshiba) and MS earns money from Blu Ray because they own some codecs which many Blu Ray movies uses.

Wii had almost worldwide release because it was released in Japan, USA and Europe in 2-3 weeks from each other.

Still, I don't think this rumor is true either.



It would be funny if this is true. Sony steals the motion controls from Nintendo and Nintendo steals Blu-Ray from Sony. I guess we'll have to wait next year to see if its true. =)



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Around the Network
Untamoi said:
shams said:

Complete bullshit, to the n^n'th extreme.

Nintendo would never use BluRay - and don't care about movie playback. If they did, they would earn Sony a lot of money (they make nothing off movies).

Nintendo would never do a worldwide simultaneous release. Its a sure way to lose money.

Trade-in? Why? What happens to all the software on the Wii?

Would a BluRay player be compatible with existing Wii discs? GC discs? I think not.

Still making massive $$ on the Wii, with Zelda, Metroid, Galaxy II (etc) all scheduled to release next year (or later) on the Wii. Release a new console? Why?

100% BS.

First of all Blu Ray isn't just Sony format. Sony doesn't own format completely. It has been said several times.

And Nintendo chooses format which is best for them. If that format is created by Sony then they choose it even if it earns money for Sony. Companies don't hate each other, if co-operation is best way to make money then they do it. Proof: Toshiba makes almost all Cell prosessors for Sony (Sony sold those factories for Toshiba) and MS earns money from Blu Ray because they own some codecs which many Blu Ray movies uses.

Wii had almost worldwide release because it was released in Japan, USA and Europe in 2-3 weeks from each other.

Still, I don't think this rumor is true either.

I don't see shams mentioned Sony owns Blu-ray format.



MikeB predicts that the PS3 will sell about 140 million units by the end of 2016 and triple the amount of 360s in the long run.

To get blu-ray, I think they would need an in with the blu-ray consortium. Sony and Apple probably wouldn't want them in. So Disney, in my opinion, would be their most obvious in with the blu-ray consortium. And Disney probably has reasons that they would want Nintendo to have blu-ray.



txrattlesnake said:
To get blu-ray, I think they would need an in with the blu-ray consortium. Sony and Apple probably wouldn't want them in. So Disney, in my opinion, would be their most obvious in with the blu-ray consortium. And Disney probably has reasons that they would want Nintendo to have blu-ray.

Also believe Toshiba is in that consortium but you right about disney being easier then all thier others get permission for blu- ray



I love fighting games !!! Come on challenge me !

Well more fuel to the crazy train:

"What I'm hearing is that Nintendo originally planned to bring the Netflix service to the Wii before the end of this year, which still might take place, but that Nintendo is also considering holding off on the Netflix service until they release their next generation Wii HD unit in early 2010." - Dan Rayburn

http://www.businessinsider.com/netflix-streaming-coming-very-shortly-to-the-nintendo-wii-2009-10



@HappySquirrel.

No Voxels are no thing of the past. Definetly not Cryengine 3 will utilise them in a lesser extent and the ID Tech Engine 6 (Yes the next one 5 is even out now)

There is a reason why Computergames will have a lotmore advantage of Voxels then any Movie in future.


Its easy Voxels are NO Progress for Movies. Infact its completly senseless to use them in Movies. Why should it be the future of game engine programming ? Its easy Today everything consists out of Textures and Polygone walls. Its pretty simple. Its like a flat scenery. Its actualy not real. the Voxels will model everything even the Inside of Figures. And Objekts. There will be no need for textures because everything will be modelled and be really 3d no bumbmapping no plain surfaces which look like they would be 3 dimensional because of Textures no. They will be completly modelled. Everything will be like it should be. And another reason is Movies dont allow you to act. But Games do. For example with multiple Textues you make effects like if you shoot someone in the head or something. Voxels will allow to modell everything inside a figure.

The World will actually be filled. For a less drastic example if you would make a whole in a Wall the wall would have a actual structure insi9de her. And would look differently maybe you could see there is wood in the wall and some old water tubes etc etc. Today the graphics try to make it seem that the world is something other thejust a simple scenery. With Voxels they will be able to fill the whole game with reality. And you can make acutally everything. Today you cant make a whole in the ground even if you have bombs or a drill but if everything will be modelled with voxels you can make everything you could make a whole in every part of the world and even a deppen whole and you can go through walls if you have some explosivs or a drill. Hmm I have Problems to explain what I think. Voxels will make the Virtual World finaly real.

the voxels of the 90s. I know the games but you cant compare it to the future possibilitys. They used the Voxels like they use Polygons and Textures. But Voxels are used for example in a MRT to make the 3 dimensional picture.

Voxel are the future the Computing Power for full Voxel engines together with animations and Physics is too low it will take a lot of time to make this possible. But it has begun and the trend wont stop because even if you make the world look perfect in a videogame it will always feel artifical and unreal because of the restrictions the games are suffering.

Voxels will make Games real. You could make a game for Blue Gene easily but it will take time for Consoles to catch up with this SuperComputer. It will be possible a PS3 was 10years ago like a SuperComputer.

They will slowly introduce the Voxel effects like they try to do in Cryengine 3 or ID tech engine 5. Its a necessary step to make the feeling of games more real. And it will be 100% the future there is no other way. Games are not Movies. Maybe they will first have to use Textures on Voxels to polish the games And only a few Objects with Voxels. If they would make the voxels really really small they could make everything like it look in reality but the Computer Power and Storage is to high atleast today. Voxels are the Atoms of the Videogame world. They could build everything exactly as it is.

Its the future no other Technology has the same potential atleast yet. I dont know how long it will take to break through but I am sure I will see it. The games in the 90s were just playing with this new Graphics thing. The Computers were to slow to make real use of that. Voxels offer infinite possibilitys. Voxels Textures and Polygons will merge the next years.

And the End will be Full Voxel Engine with emulated animations and realtime Raytraycing. Why do you think that the Programmers still want to force the technology ? Because its a thing of the past ? For sure not Crysis 1 even used Voxels for their terrain but the terrain was not filled they used maybe a tiny layer. or a couple of voxel layers. Its anywhere near what I think will be the future.

You can make Voxels as small as you want and you can use almost as much as you want for every object. I think in the beginning you wont see why they use them. Infact i think most people dont get the idea behind it its not only for the Visuals. Its inevitable they will be the next step 100%. You can EMULATE visually the reality with it.