By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Ratchet and Clank ToD review thread.

yuda398 on 24 October 2007

All the gamerankings scores are here-

Gametap: 10/10
Play Magazine: 10/10
Gamepro: 5/5
PSM: 9.5/10
PSU: 9.5/10
GamerNode: 9.5/10
IGN: 9.4/10
GameZone: 9.3/10
PSM3 UK: 9.3/10
CVG: 9.3/10
Game Informer: 9.25/10
Pro-G: 9/10
Gaming Age: 9/10
GamesRadar: 9/10
GameTrailers: 9/10
EGM: 9/10
PSX Extreme: 9/10
Gamepost: 9/10
GameAlmighty: 9/10
OPM: 8.9/10
1UP: 8.5/10
EDGE: 8/10
Gamespot: 7.5/10

average score: 92.3%



Around the Network
Andir on 24 October 2007
shams said:
See Sony fans - it hurts when a good title gets a ridiculous review score.

We should collectively hassle reviewers that give out bad scores - regardless of what platform they head to.

I wonder if its below MS to try and change reviewers minds with money?

 I would say no.  Bribe Advertising money is hard for some people to turn down.



It seems the mods need help with this forum.  I have zero tolerance for trolling, platform criticism (Rule 4), and poster bad-mouthing (Rule 3.4) and you will be reported.

Review before posting: http://vgchartz.com/forum/rules.php

endurance on 24 October 2007

gamespot totally underrated this game



darthdevidem on 24 October 2007

Well THEY GAVE 8.5 to METROID

so I'm not surprised....



Supporter of

 SONY & Nintendo

 Consoles owned - SNES, N64, PS, GC, PS2, PSP, PS3

 I DO NOT support Xbox

My prediction for YEARS END:

WII - 18.3 Million

Xbox 360 - 15 Million

Playstation 3 - 8.5 Million

sieanr on 24 October 2007
ssj12 said:
konnichiwa said:
makingmusic476 said:
If I recall correctly, GameSpot is a subset of the C|Net network, and C|Net is owned by MS if I'm not mistaken. Teh conspiracy!!1!

Jup true Leo-J told me that.


 Shockingly Leo is correct. C|Net is owned by Microsoft and GameSpot is owned by C|Net. idk about the Microsoft biased by the masssive a banner of the 360 that randomly appears on all Sony and Nintendo pages does point to something. 

Shockingly you're both wrong.

Cnet is a publicly traded company, of which Microsoft does not own a part of. For example, Cnet gave the PS3 a higher review score than both the 360 and Wii, so theres you're pro sony bias.

Oh, and theres no way this score was handed out to generate more traffic. Everything happens because of anit-sony FUD, its what makes the world go round.



Leo-j said: If a dvd for a pc game holds what? Crysis at 3000p or something, why in the world cant a blu-ray disc do the same?

ssj12 said: Player specific decoders are nothing more than specialized GPUs. Gran Turismo is the trust driving simulator of them all. 

"Why do they call it the xbox 360? Because when you see it, you'll turn 360 degrees and walk away" 

Around the Network
Kasz216 on 24 October 2007
zackblue said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
so, if it gave a sony game a bad score, it MUST be biased!

SOMG, welcome to bad reviews, happens to everyone

Well its owned by microsoft..

OT: I wasnt expecting such great reviews, I dont listen to gamespot since I knew they were biased since e3 06(yep 06) When the ps3 came out I remember the exact moment, there entire site was filled with gears of war montages and only 1 ps3 video. Very biased indeed. This just proves they are even more biased and just downright dissapointing.

So did you just miss the post where i showed Gamespot wasn't bias statistically or did you see it and are just ignoring it to bolster your fanboy sense of shock and offense?

Also... it's not owned by microsoft.

 



Kasz216 on 24 October 2007

Also... are people really argueing that Halo 3 should have the same score as R&C?

I don't see what the mention of Halo has to do with anything.



Garcian Smith on 24 October 2007

I don't know. I honestly think that Gamespot is the only review site to really "get it" concerning R&C:ToD.

All the other reviews go on about "zomg grafix! and oh by the way it's basically the same as the other games, except with some bad Sixaxis controls and not much of a story. 9.5/10!!" The Gamespot reviewer seems like the only one who actually played the game all the way through.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

user_nat on 24 October 2007

CNET is a publicly held company and is not owned by Microsoft..
(as people seem to say everytime gamespot rates a non 360 game low..)



Deviation59 on 24 October 2007
thanny said:
next time a wii game gets a bad gs review and ps3 owners say "thats how good it actually is, gamespot are the only site who can tell the thruth".. im looking forward to saying "ahem... r&c"

but seriously do gamespot WANT to drive away wii + ps3 fans? its just ridiculous....

if galaxy goes lower then 9.0 ill be on the next plane to america >_>

 I know anything can happen but I doubt even GameSpot could give a Mario game less than a 9... still, I'd love to sit back and watch the storm if they do.