I declare this thread a success.
There are games on Wii which I think it was too bad that they failed. They didn't seem to be test games, but sometimes good and great games fail when the companies don't think about sales and marketing.
But even then, I do think it is better if companies making failed games collapse. A game which is loved by some, Psychonauts, led to the ruination of Majesco. Majesco was forced to rethink their entire company and business, and has survived since then on the back of Cooking Mama, a series which is loved by millions, having sold 8 million copies with just 4 titles on Wii and DS. The DS sequel has not sold that much less than the original, which indicates the title is viewed as high quality and is selling on more than just novelty.
But for a company making a straight-up bad game, I would rather it entirely collapse, and those talented people in the company start somewhere else new. It will be better for me in the long run, if they make better games. It will be better for the industry, if they make better selling games. It will be better for the developers themselves, to be in a growth-creating company rather than one which only survives as the living dead, on the brink of inevitable collapse in the future, as part of a conglomerate like EA.
If, like some say, EA and other companies follow through with their threat, and don't put more of their "core games" on Wii, maybe you missed the first two words of the thread. Good riddance.
"[Our former customers] are unable to find software which they WANT to play."
"The way to solve this problem lies in how to communicate what kind of games [they CAN play]."
Satoru Iwata, Nintendo President. Only slightly paraphrased.