Two words, "European Union", Oh hey, how about the U.N. Anybody country belonging to the UN MUST adhere to U.N. laws. What U.N. law does not cover, is free to be "interprated" by the individule countries. It's kinda like all the countries in the U.N. are states, and the U.N. is a central governing system. This is the format that will be followed. Believe me, this is something the far left radicals want, will they acvhieve it so soon, probably not. The guy in the video is taking this to extremes. IF such a "treaty" is signed, we WILL still enjoy some of our freedoms, however, we WILL be beholdened to a socialist style central governing system. This WILL take away many freedoms we now take for granted. If Obama does sign such a treaty (and I wouldn't put it past him) all I can say is, "How's this for change?"

I would like to second what Kasz said.

Also, I would like to add that this is just a hick using a Strawman argument that is formed out of his sole paranoid delusion too. He seems to be like those people who comes from a nowhere town that claim they have been abducted by aliens.

...

Oh yeah, and Kasz Aston villa beat Chelsea 2-1. I was well happy .

The UN is utterly powerless without the will of it's member states driving it. The UN has certainly done some good in helping to curtail global conflict, but ultimately it has no ability to directly influence it's sovereign members, and certainly not any of the seeded Security Council members.

Well, according to these folks the majority in Congress would be in support of Obama signing this treaty.

Two words, "European Union", Oh hey, how about the U.N. Anybody country belonging to the UN MUST adhere to U.N. laws. What U.N. law does not cover, is free to be "interprated" by the individule countries. It's kinda like all the countries in the U.N. are states, and the U.N. is a central governing system. This is the format that will be followed. Believe me, this is something the far left radicals want, will they acvhieve it so soon, probably not. The guy in the video is taking this to extremes. IF such a "treaty" is signed, we WILL still enjoy some of our freedoms, however, we WILL be beholdened to a socialist style central governing system. This WILL take away many freedoms we now take for granted. If Obama does sign such a treaty (and I wouldn't put it past him) all I can say is, "How's this for change?"

The UN is utterly powerless without the will of it's member states driving it. The UN has certainly done some good in helping to curtail global conflict, but ultimately it has no ability to directly influence it's sovereign members, and certainly not any of the seeded Security Council members.