By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - PS3 for BR already obsolete?

What the hell are they gonna put on all that space? Maybe a whole TV series or something but that's it. Games aren't using 100+gb yet.



Around the Network

The internets is full of FUD (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt). If the PS3 can't cope with those new capacities, neither can any other BR player of its generation.




binary solo said:
^ Not only that but which PS3 game developer is going to be idiot enought to put a game on a 100 gig disc IF PS3 (i.e. the ONLY machine capable of running said game) can't handle it,?

The OP is being disingenuous by saying that they were thinking of getting a PS3 once it becomes even cheaper still, because they like some of the exclusive games. Yet they are going to never buy one now because it might not be able to play BR movies in future?

I think of one thing we can be absolutely certain: EVERY PS3 game made from now until the end of time will be able to be played on today's PS3. So stop worrying/making excuses already and start saving ur pennies, or get that second job (and now with the price cuts it only needs to be a part time job). Either that or be genuine about your true intentions regarding console ownership for this gen.

BTW movie studios would be almost as stupid to put movies onto >50gig discs. given the capabilities of the current install base (not limited to PS3). Just like the article says VHS tapes developed longer play capability which older VHS machines weren't able to handle, but AFAIK not a single movie was ever released on VHS in long play mode.

If this is the reason someone uses to justify not getting a PS3 then it's pretty clear they never intended to get a PS3 in the first place. Seems odd that people feel the need to justify not buying something like this. Normally you need a reason to justify the spending of money on luxury goods, not the other way round; does this reflect the rampantly consumerist culture we've become?

The funny thing is, you are judging the discs as if the GB are the same as a DVD GB. Also Earth was supposed to ship on a single quad layer blu-ray disc, but since not EVERY blu-ray player could be upgraded they decided not to.(Technically every-blu-ray has the capacity to be upgraded through firmware, but a very small margin, around 5% of the BR players are not internet combatible).

You can fit 4.5 hours of 1080p content on a single layer DVD. So 300 minutes. A single DVD holds 120 minutes of 480 content, and a DL disc(which most movies come on now adays) holds 240 minutes. 50 GB disc holds 9 hours, or about 600 minutes.

 

Now one is going to want a 9 hour movie, or even a 18 hour movie in contrast to 100gb disc, but thats not what we are doing.

 

Language packs, movies will come with up to 10 languages, and subtitles etc. They will come with comentary, and even different versions of a movie, from european release, to theatrical, to uncut, to cut. Stuff like that adds up pretty quickly. What about seasons of shows? Normally they come on more then 1 disc. Why put something on 2 single layers if it can fit on a 50 gig? It costs more, and it also costs more to put it on 2 50 gig discs then 1 100gig disc. 13 one hour episode seasons, 26 half hour seasons, and include stuff like special features etc? Why waste money on 2 50 gig discs, when for a fraction more put it on a 100gig disc? All current BD players can read them... Except for that small percentage without BD live, though there is a return and get a new one for those models(They take the BD live incombatable models, salvage drive and produce newer players).



thats retarded the next gen of movies wont be on disc it will be digital thats what cd's gone too and so will movies and once that happens fre movies like the fre music !



There wont be a 100gig game this gen, even if Sony changed the drives in the PS3.

Theres been 2 games that use 50gigs. Once more developers start uysing the full blu-ray disc, then Sony might discuss it, but they'll probably just put it in the next PS (PS4).



Around the Network

you will wait til' it hits 150$? I don't think you're seriously considering buying one then.



that was a dumb article. Every movie and game will play on the PS3.



Long Live SHIO!

let's wait til' the data can't even fit on a 50GB when compressed. At this point, all the largest games had a lot of uncompressed data



theprof00 said:
you will wait til' it hits 150$? I don't think you're seriously considering buying one then.

I certainly would buy one if it hit $150.  That's just a golden price point.  By that time, the amount of games that will already be available not to mention that they will be costing around $15 to $20 by then too.  I tried a lot of PS2 games like this and some were titles I would have never looked twice at when they were $50.  Hell, I still buy a N64 game once in a while when I come across something I haven't played and want to try out.  Just bought Shadows of the Empire (or something like that) early this year on eBay for $4 I think.  I always liked Turok so I got the games I didn't have before on eBay for cheap.  I'm in no rush to buy a PS3 and Uncharted 2 right now.  I can be patient.  But I will be playing the hell out of it when I see my nephew this winter.  He would bring his game system with him for 2 weeks and we play like crazy on it.  Last one we played was COD4 on it and it was pretty damn good.  And the one where we kept fighting with Subzero and Joker.  That one's a lot of fun.



Consoles owned: NES, N64, PS1, GC, PS2, Wii.

Currently playing...