dsister44 said:
Because they are in last with them. And they haven't gotten one this year(?) |
Well.. how does that affect Nintendo? I still see them in 1st place and making shitloads of money.
dsister44 said:
Because they are in last with them. And they haven't gotten one this year(?) |
Well.. how does that affect Nintendo? I still see them in 1st place and making shitloads of money.
| cgkc17 said: and what exactly is the ps3 (supposed to be) comebacking from? |
being released a year later?
@Falcon
I was just trying to answer you. Stacraft seemed to leave the thread. Don't shoot the messenger
dsister44 said:
being released a year later?
@Falcon I was just trying to answer you. Stacraft seemed to leave the thread. Don't shoot the messenger |
i still dont get what it needs a comeback from.
PS: i believe your sig is inappropriate, what with them 3D dot balls just hanging out there...

dsister44 said:
being released a year later?
@Falcon I was just trying to answer you. Stacraft seemed to leave the thread. Don't shoot the messenger |
I know
I just said what I would've said to him.
AE101 said:
I'm not sure about any of that. |
Oh I see. So it's gloating anytime someone puts forth objective information regarding the quaility of each console's back-catalogue with virtually no personal analysis whatsoever?
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS
| starcraft said: Oh I see. So it's gloating anytime someone puts forth objective information regarding the quaility of each console's back-catalogue with virtually no personal analysis whatsoever? |
On the other hand the very fact that you attach to these numbers the interpretation of "quality of each console's back catalogue" is completely personal.
I would like to hear the logic by which Forza 2, GRAW 1, Geometry wars add more quality today to the 360's catalogue than R&C or Uncharted 1 or VC do to the PS3's.
| starcraft said: Worth noting that the next 5 Ps3 games and the next 10 Xbox 360 games are on 89. I also just realised that given the nature of the evidence put forth in this thread and the demographical spread of this site this thread may die quite early. ![]() |
Also worth noting that 3 of the 360 games rated at 89 are all rated at 88 on the PS3 (Dead Space, Beatles: Rock Band, Burnout: UB) despite being indentical on each platform.
| Falcon095 said: Why poor Nintendo? |

According to "metacritic" the Wii is doomed...
Vote Today To Help Get A Konami & SEGA Game Localized.This Will Only Work If Lots Of People Vote.
Click on the Image to Head to the Voting Page (A vote for Yakuza is a vote to save gaming)
Metacritic has nothing to do with Tripe A Status or whatever you want to call it. It's delusional at best.
WereKitten said:
On the other hand the very fact that you attach to these numbers the interpretation of "quality of each console's back catalogue" is completely personal. I would like to hear the logic by which Forza 2, GRAW 1, Geometry wars add more quality today to the 360's catalogue than R&C or Uncharted 1 or VC do to the PS3's. |
I would like you to provide a more objective measure of console library quality before you criticise my commonly accepted one.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS