By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - GT hasn't the best graphics for a racing game in its generation, at all.

Baroque_Dude on 13 October 2009
Seece said:
It's amazing to think people raved over graphics at that level, as we do now. Do you think it'll be the same in 10 years? I can't see the leap getting "that" significant!

I don't know... As I said in a post of mine here in this forum (I don't remember neither when nor where), I still like the graphics, especially in the replays (camera FOV does help a lot).

Talking about leaps, generational leaps will become shorter and shorter in terms of graphical quality, as it has been said several times. For instance, I don't think that we'll see a great difference in graphics between GT5 and GT7. Programmers will worry more about physics, content, gameplay, originality, etc.



"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -

The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!

Around the Network
Baroque_Dude on 13 October 2009
grimygunz said:
@ OP you do realize that GT2 came out on the PSX as well right? I's imagine that 2 looked better then the first.

Of course, but the trick was to only mention "GT" (= GT1).



"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -

The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!

Baroque_Dude on 13 October 2009
Username2324 said:

You're comparing a console game from 1997 to a game available on PC in 1998, which is most likely where your screenshot came from.
Nope, I'm comparing 2 PS games. GT was only on PS and NFS III was on PS and PC, as well. Both screenshots are of the PS games.
Username2324 said:

Edit: Too lazy to post, and perhaps not the most reliable source, but on Wikipedia the screenshot for Gran Turismo (PS) is clearly better than the screenshot for NFS III (PS)

In my opinion, no screenshots of GT can look better than a screenshot of NFS III on PS.



"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -

The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!

AlkamistStar on 13 October 2009
Baroque_Dude said:
Username2324 said:

You're comparing a console game from 1997 to a game available on PC in 1998, which is most likely where your screenshot came from.
Nope, I'm comparing 2 PS games. GT was only on PS and NFS III was on PS and PC, as well. Both screenshots are of the PS games.
Username2324 said:

Edit: Too lazy to post, and perhaps not the most reliable source, but on Wikipedia the screenshot for Gran Turismo (PS) is clearly better than the screenshot for NFS III (PS)

In my opinion, no screenshots of GT can look better than a screenshot of NFS III on PS.


True, true.



Follow Me: twitter.com/alkamiststar

Watch Me: youtube.com/alkamiststar

Play Along: XBL & SEN : AlkamistStar

CatFangs806 on 13 October 2009
Baroque_Dude said:
CatFangs806 said:
You should have included the other three GT games and compared them with competing games of their time. At least it would have added more credibility to your thread.

Other 3? That would go into the PS2, and I'm referring to just one generation.

Moreover, GT = GT1.


You do know that GT2 was on the PS1 as well.



Around the Network
1337 Gamer on 13 October 2009

wow this thread is lame



Long Live SHIO!

Baroque_Dude on 13 October 2009
CatFangs806 said:
Baroque_Dude said:
CatFangs806 said:
You should have included the other three GT games and compared them with competing games of their time. At least it would have added more credibility to your thread.

Other 3? That would go into the PS2, and I'm referring to just one generation.

Moreover, GT = GT1.


You do know that GT2 was on the PS1 as well.

Indeed... but GT + GT2 = 2 games, not 3, because GT3 was on the PS2, not on the PS.



"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -

The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!

Baroque_Dude on 13 October 2009
1337 Gamer said:
wow this thread is lame

Congratulations for your "not lame" post.



"I think that I don't think."

- Soli Deo Gloria -

The FUTURE is the FUTURE. Now... B_E_L_I_E_V_E!