By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - EA wants 'open gaming platform'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7052420.stm

 

Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo should abandon the console wars and help build a common gaming platform, a senior executive at Electronic Arts has said.

Gerhard Florin said incompatible consoles made life harder for developers and consumers.

"We want an open, standard platform which is much easier than having five which are not compatible," said EA's head of international publishing.

He said the web and set-top boxes would grow in importance to the industry.

"We're platform agnostic and we definitely don't want to have one platform which is a walled garden," said Mr Florin.

EA currently produces games for more than 14 different gaming systems, including consoles, portable devices and PCs.

"I am not sure how long we will have dedicated consoles - but we could be talking up to 15 years," Mr Florin added.

Gaming will just require potentially a £49.99 box from Tesco made in China with a hard drive, a wi-fi connection and a games engine inside
Nick Parker, analyst

He predicted that server-based games streamed to PCs or set-top boxes, would become increasingly important.

"You don't need an Xbox 360, PS3 or Wii - the consumer won't even realise the platform it is being played on."

Set-top boxes are becoming increasingly more powerful as they include technology to deal with High Definition TV streams and access to the internet.

Basic games

Both Sky and BT offer personal video recorders that play basic games.

In the 1980s Microsoft led an initiative to create a common home computer platform, called MSX, and supported by Sony and Philips among others.

It became a popular games platform in Japan but died out due to the growth of consoles and the rise of PCs.

Games consultant Nick Parker said the long term future of gaming would most likely not lie with dedicated consoles.

But he said competition among manufacturers had driven innovation.

"Competition was required to ensure the pace of technology was maintained."

He added: "Going forward that is irrelevant. Gaming will just require potentially a £49.99 box from Tesco made in China with a hard drive, a wi-fi connection and a games engine inside.

"It's basically a boiled-down PC."

But he predicted that walled gardens would still surround platforms and that an open system would not emerge.

Microsoft and Sony have positioned their consoles as all-in-one entertainment devices in recent years but both firms have struggled with non-gaming content.

Outside of the US, Microsoft has yet to strike deals with firms for meaningful video content while Sony has turned to companies like Sky after being unable to agree licensing terms with its own in-house content providers, such as Sony Pictures and MGM.

Absorb consoles

Mr Parker said he believed they were in danger of being overtaken by other companies, such as Apple, and PC technology.

"There are a lot of companies coming into the market."

With space in the living room limited, set-top boxes could yet absorb console functionality.

Mr Parker said: "Games will be provided over the net. There might not be a need for a PS4 or dedicated consoles."

With Microsoft's track record in licensing its technology to other hardware manufacturers and Sony hoping to recoup the cost of developing the Cell processor, both firms could move toward a business plan of offering their services and hardware to other manufacturers.

Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo could instead be walled garden content providers and licensees, said Mr Parker.

"There could be a Nintendo channel, a PlayStation channel and an Xbox channel on your set-top box," he added.

 ------------------------------------------

Good idea or would this mean less inivation and less options? and less games? 

 

 

 



Around the Network

worst idea ever:

1) no competition means they could do what they wanted.
2) too many cooks spoil the broth. The one console would be a mish mash of too moany ideas and the console would just turn out to be worse then three seperate consoles.



Yeah I agree

also it would be like the PC loads, Have loads of different setting etc we just want something simple



EA just wants to maximize their profits ( fire as many devs as possible) , but can't if they have to produce a game for so many different plattforms ...

they don't care for the consumer at all, who would surely get the short end of the stick ,if gaming companies really decided to stop competing with each other



EA wants a monopoly in the gaming industry. Big surprise there.

Seriously, do these "senior executives" actually think before they speak?



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom

 

 

Around the Network

Just plug a PC to the living room HD TV and that's it.

That is called convergence and its the main reason why Microsoft is on the console market because they know it will happen sooner or later.

The main reason why PC gaming is a little weak right now is because with 3 manufacturers there are a lot of exclusives that wont get ported to PC.



@ guigr )

but EA doesn't want PCs , because PCs have millions ah no billions of different configurations and you have to ensure a game runs on most of them , that's why it's too costly to produce games for PC



Perhaps EA should make there own system



I think the streaming video idea is interesting. It will require a lot of bandwidth and a lot of resources on the server end though.

Edit: If that's what he's saying



Lafiel: Well they were quite happy at their beginning to develop on PC with no 1st party concurrence. They started to develop on consoles when they were big enough to challenge them.

 

Dazmando: I assume they haven't forgotten the 3DO.