By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - ive been here for 2 years

marciosmg on 02 October 2009
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:

Im joking, dtewi. Heres why its wrong:

 

The square root of a number elevated to square (again, not sure on english) is the module of that number. So:

(4 - (9/2))2 = (5 - (9/2))2

You cant just remove the square and eliminate the 9/2. Actually is this:

!4 - (9/2)! = !5 - (9/2)!  (! stands for the module)

!-0,5! = !0,5!

0,5 = 0,5

See?

Oh, that was to the power of two?

The notation for "to the power of" is ^.

All you had to do was watch how thw 81/4 turned into 9/2. What do you thing happened?

But I still say 0.9999 is different than 1.

Know why?

Cause 0.999999 has no 1 in it.

 

I didn't get what had happened. All I saw was you multiplying by two, not squaring.

Also, do you see a 2 in 3/6? No? But isn't it still equal to two?

0.999... is just another way to say one. They are not different numbers, just different ways to say the same thing.

Again.

0.9999.....  There is 0. There is 9. There is NO 1.

 

  <------------------------------- PAY ATTENTION THIS TIME!!!!



www.jamesvandermemes.com

Around the Network
killeryoshis on 02 October 2009

I've lurked longer than that



Tag:I'm not bias towards Nintendo. You just think that way (Admin note - it's "biased".  Not "bias")
(killeryoshis note - Who put that there ?)
Switch is 9th generation. Everyone else is playing on last gen systems! UPDATE: This is no longer true. 2nd UPDATE: I have no Switch 2. I am now behind

Biggest pikmin fan on VGchartz I won from a voting poll
I am not a nerd. I am enthusiast.  EN-THU-SI-AST!
Do Not Click here or else I will call on the eye of shining justice on you. 

WessleWoggle on 02 October 2009
killeryoshis said:
I've lurked longer than that

I've lurked a very long time as well.



Orca_Azure on 02 October 2009

you started posting when you were 11?!



marciosmg on 02 October 2009

Wrong thread.. lol



www.jamesvandermemes.com

Around the Network
dtewi on 02 October 2009
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:

Im joking, dtewi. Heres why its wrong:

 

The square root of a number elevated to square (again, not sure on english) is the module of that number. So:

(4 - (9/2))2 = (5 - (9/2))2

You cant just remove the square and eliminate the 9/2. Actually is this:

!4 - (9/2)! = !5 - (9/2)!  (! stands for the module)

!-0,5! = !0,5!

0,5 = 0,5

See?

Oh, that was to the power of two?

The notation for "to the power of" is ^.

All you had to do was watch how thw 81/4 turned into 9/2. What do you thing happened?

But I still say 0.9999 is different than 1.

Know why?

Cause 0.999999 has no 1 in it.

 

I didn't get what had happened. All I saw was you multiplying by two, not squaring.

Also, do you see a 2 in 3/6? No? But isn't it still equal to two?

0.999... is just another way to say one. They are not different numbers, just different ways to say the same thing.

Again.

0.9999.....  There is 0. There is 9. There is NO 1.

 

  <------------------------------- PAY ATTENTION THIS TIME!!!!

Read this thread.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=43043

Don't read many of my posts unless you want your head to explode out of being annoyed. I was 12 and was pretty annoying back then.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

WessleWoggle on 02 October 2009

This is the right thread...



dtewi on 02 October 2009
Orca_Azure said:
you started posting when you were 11?!

So did I.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

marciosmg on 02 October 2009
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:

Im joking, dtewi. Heres why its wrong:

 

The square root of a number elevated to square (again, not sure on english) is the module of that number. So:

(4 - (9/2))2 = (5 - (9/2))2

You cant just remove the square and eliminate the 9/2. Actually is this:

!4 - (9/2)! = !5 - (9/2)!  (! stands for the module)

!-0,5! = !0,5!

0,5 = 0,5

See?

Oh, that was to the power of two?

The notation for "to the power of" is ^.

All you had to do was watch how thw 81/4 turned into 9/2. What do you thing happened?

But I still say 0.9999 is different than 1.

Know why?

Cause 0.999999 has no 1 in it.

 

I didn't get what had happened. All I saw was you multiplying by two, not squaring.

Also, do you see a 2 in 3/6? No? But isn't it still equal to two?

0.999... is just another way to say one. They are not different numbers, just different ways to say the same thing.

Again.

0.9999.....  There is 0. There is 9. There is NO 1.

 

  <------------------------------- PAY ATTENTION THIS TIME!!!!

Read this thread.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=43043

Don't read many of my posts unless you want your head to explode out of being annoyed. I was 12 and was pretty annoying back then.

You WERE annoying? lol

And reading I remembered, for you to say 0.99...=1, you have to prove it by limits. I had forgotten the name.

So, you are kinda right even though its a simplication to make it easier to do stuff. math does that a lot.



www.jamesvandermemes.com

dtewi on 02 October 2009
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:
dtewi said:
marciosmg said:

Im joking, dtewi. Heres why its wrong:

 

The square root of a number elevated to square (again, not sure on english) is the module of that number. So:

(4 - (9/2))2 = (5 - (9/2))2

You cant just remove the square and eliminate the 9/2. Actually is this:

!4 - (9/2)! = !5 - (9/2)!  (! stands for the module)

!-0,5! = !0,5!

0,5 = 0,5

See?

Oh, that was to the power of two?

The notation for "to the power of" is ^.

All you had to do was watch how thw 81/4 turned into 9/2. What do you thing happened?

But I still say 0.9999 is different than 1.

Know why?

Cause 0.999999 has no 1 in it.

 

I didn't get what had happened. All I saw was you multiplying by two, not squaring.

Also, do you see a 2 in 3/6? No? But isn't it still equal to two?

0.999... is just another way to say one. They are not different numbers, just different ways to say the same thing.

Again.

0.9999.....  There is 0. There is 9. There is NO 1.

 

  <------------------------------- PAY ATTENTION THIS TIME!!!!

Read this thread.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=43043

Don't read many of my posts unless you want your head to explode out of being annoyed. I was 12 and was pretty annoying back then.

You WERE annoying? lol

And reading I remembered, for you to say 0.99...=1, you have to prove it by limits. I had forgotten the name.

So, you are kinda right even though its a simplication to make it easier to do stuff. math does that a lot.

Hey, my annoyance level has been cut back a lot.

Also, this is NOT at ALL a complex theory. It can be proven elementarily (?) and easily.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you