By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - The vgchartz ranking game--Metal Gear Solid 4!

KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Are you going to count mirson's vote?

he did some ridiculous PS3 bashing a few months ago

 

I agree, PS3 haters scores should not count.  To balance things the fanboys scores should not count either, they are both extreme ends of the spectrum.

Can we also not count scores of people who rate games down like loads of points bcause of 1 small error? i.e. you

 

What single small error?  I could write a list of errors or thigns wrong with the game but it would likely crash the website through bandwidth overload the moment someone tried to read it.

try it......don't speak, do actions

& the campaign is 2 hours long my ass.....no reviewer has said its 2 hours long & it isn't

if thats how the rest of your "points" are.....i.e. lies.....then we shouldn't count your vote.

 

 

It is not lies, my Big Boss rank came out around 2 hours 30 and were a few areas of that I really had to slow down in order to not get spotted, if I didn't mind getting spotted would have been a lot faster.

 

 

Skip to 40 seconds, this guy did it in little over 90 minutes.  There is your evidence.  Try and deny it, please.

right.....the evidence is there, but my reply is "so what"

Kylie Dog.....not everyone will finish the game so quickly, I took 30 hours on my first playthrough

if you want ot RUSH through the game at this pace, skipping cutscenes which arw a part of the MEtal Gear Experience.....your welcome, but simply taking off points from a game by completing it so quickly is silly......you couldn't possibly get the full experience.

All you have shown is by "using the quickest method" the game can be finished in 2 hours 30 min

however that is extremely misleading to future buyers of the game, extremely misleading.

All you have done since MGS4 released is nit pick it & hate it for the most ridiculous reasons, most people agree with me on this.

The fact is to GET the FULL EXPERIENCE from MGS4.....you cannot finish it in 2 hours 30 min.

To enjoy MGS4's gameplay to the MAX.....you cannot finish it in 2 hours 30 min

YOu rushed the gameplay bits....& didn't enjoy them, thats your problem

 



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Around the Network
KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
KylieDog said:
darthdevidem01 said:
Are you going to count mirson's vote?

he did some ridiculous PS3 bashing a few months ago

 

I agree, PS3 haters scores should not count.  To balance things the fanboys scores should not count either, they are both extreme ends of the spectrum.

Can we also not count scores of people who rate games down like loads of points bcause of 1 small error? i.e. you

 

What single small error?  I could write a list of errors or thigns wrong with the game but it would likely crash the website through bandwidth overload the moment someone tried to read it.

try it......don't speak, do actions

& the campaign is 2 hours long my ass.....no reviewer has said its 2 hours long & it isn't

if thats how the rest of your "points" are.....i.e. lies.....then we shouldn't count your vote.

 

 

It is not lies, my Big Boss rank came out around 2 hours 30 and were a few areas of that I really had to slow down in order to not get spotted, if I didn't mind getting spotted would have been a lot faster.

 

 

Skip to 40 seconds, this guy did it in little over 90 minutes.  There is your evidence.  Try and deny it, please.

right.....the evidence is there, but my reply is "so what"

 

 

So what?  You just called me a liar and tried to claim my issues with the game don't exist and I turned you upside down. 

 

I rushed nothing, I went through the levels the way the game was meant to be played, unlike the guy on the speedrun I posted I didn't use a Big Boss camo mask.  There is little over 2 hours worth of game, playing how it is meant to be played, on the hardest difficulty under the strictest conditions.  The rest is cutscenes.

You turned my argument upside down?

I don't know how you finished the gameplay bit in 2 hours alone......but I can say this much, you sure as hell wern't enjoying those bits like most of us have.

Besides how did you turn my argument upside down when you STILL havn't given me "all the reasons" for the game being a 7.0

you know you said "write a list of errors or thigns wrong with the game but it would likely crash the website through bandwidth overload the moment someone tried to read it." bla bla bla

Well where is that list?

Until you provide such a list & prove that wasn't an over-exaggeration like 90% of my threads.....you have lost this war.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

^^ Oh stop it.  This isn't the thread for this.  I will be counting Kyle Dogs score because I know he doesn't hate PS3, and he's allowed to think a game isn't as good as the rest of you do.

As for Mirison, I will look through some of his post history and if he is a PS3 hater than I won't count his vote.

EDIT- Ok I browsed through some his post history, and he's not a fanboy by any means, he doesn't think this is a very good MGS at all, and he's entitled to believe that (although 6/10 is pretty freakin low imo) and he obviously owns a PS3 

@ Infinity-Realistically only a fanoby would rate a triple A game less than a 5.



Well my first playthrough of MGS4 took me 35 hours. My second playthrough took me 18 hours and that was skipping the boring cutscenes. My fastest playthrough was 7 hours and that was skipping all the cutscenes. I'm really amazed at some peoples ratings of this game. @Kyliedog. Have you yourself finished this game in 2 hours or are you basing this off a screenshot from a japanese gamer who probably knows all the ins and outs of the game because hes finished the game so many times.



I can see if he himself beat it in 2 hours, but so what if someone else did. That is no reason to give it a low score. In my opinion that shouldn't be counted that just doesn't make sense.



I'm not martin luther king. I don't have a dream. I have a plan

Sell a man a fish you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish you just ruined a perfect business opportunity.

We didn't emerge out of the stone age because we ran out of stones. Its time to be proactive not reactive.

Around the Network

Ya know whats real funny I've finished loads of games in less than 2 hours over the years. The most recent 1 being RE5 but I'd never dream of taking points off a game because of it unless I finished it in 2 hours on my first playthrough of the game. Knowbody in the whole world finished MGS4 in less than 6 hours on there first playthrough. If they did then they must of been mindless zombies. Also taking points off a game for Lag? I can honestly say I never played 1 single online game where I havn't experianced lag. Even on games with dedicated servers I've experianced lag. It's not really something you can take a point away for because theres many reasons for experiancing lag?



well as long as you had more problems with the game than that, I have no problem with your score, people like different things.



I'm not martin luther king. I don't have a dream. I have a plan

Sell a man a fish you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish you just ruined a perfect business opportunity.

We didn't emerge out of the stone age because we ran out of stones. Its time to be proactive not reactive.

for me 10/10... look at my sig with 2D bar code reader...



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4

yo_john117 said:

^^ Oh stop it.  This isn't the thread for this.  I will be counting Kyle Dogs score because I know he doesn't hate PS3, and he's allowed to think a game isn't as good as the rest of you do.

As for Mirison, I will look through some of his post history and if he is a PS3 hater than I won't count his vote.

EDIT- Ok I browsed through some his post history, and he's not a fanboy by any means, he doesn't think this is a very good MGS at all, and he's entitled to believe that (although 6/10 is pretty freakin low imo) and he obviously owns a PS3 

@ Infinity-Realistically only a fanoby would rate a triple A game less than a 5.

did you go back 3 months?

he was literally trolling it, it meaning the PS3 not MGS



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

Totally false! People's opinions can and do run outside the mainstream. I can name at least 4 games that have a Metacritic rating above 90 I would rate below 5/10. Get a clue!