You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.
It should be noted that "Darwin's" Theory of evolution has been modified to the point of where he wouldn't recognize it before.
So there is a lot of shit Darwin said that wasn't right.
The actual origin of life was something that likely came well after Darwin.
| Kasz216 said: It should be noted that "Darwin's" Theory of evolution has been modified to the point of where he wouldn't recognize it before. The actual origin of life was something that likely came well after Darwin. |
isnt that the whole point of Science? to challenge and refine theorys and ideas? couldnt you say the same about many things in science?
SciFiBoy said:
isnt that the whole point of Science? to challenge and refine theorys and ideas? couldnt you say the same about many things in science? |
Yes why?
If your thinking I don't believe in evolution or something... I knew the basics by like gradeschool.
My point was, there is a lot of stuff in Darwin's original book that wasn't right. That doesn't make it untrue.
| stof said: A much more damning condemnation of evolutionism would be scientists' complete lack of an explanation for how your brain works. |
HAHA
Post of the Day
| Kasz216 said: It should be noted that "Darwin's" Theory of evolution has been modified to the point of where he wouldn't recognize it before. The actual origin of life was something that likely came well after Darwin. |
Now Kasz obviously listened in school. 
Wait, Kasz went to school?
| The Ghost of RubangB said: Wait, Kasz went to school? |
I even have a college degree to prove it.
It's possibly even more worthless then the one you have.
Psychology.
highwaystar101 said:
Now Kasz obviously listened in school. |
Nah, this is stuff i learned around the 4th grade or so on my own.
Was a very inquisitive child.
| CommunistHater said: Eugene Koonin and two friends from the NIH went tree-hunting. They examined almost 7,000 genomes of prokaryotes. They found trees all right – a whole forest of them. They even found 102 NUTs (nearly universal trees) in the forest. Unfortunately, it’s not what they wanted to find: a single universal tree of life that Darwin’s theory requires. They had to seriously consider the question: was there a biological big bang? Isn’t it amazing the lengths the Temple of Darwin will go to avoid scientific fact that evolution can not be responsible for the major jumps in the development of life on earth?
|
Why does Darwin's theory require that these two friends be able to locate a universal tree? Why does it require that the tree exists to this day? How does the tree fit into Darwin's theory in your view?
All of these questions are vital to a serious discussion on the story presented in your OP.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
