Reasonable said: ^^ It was just the way I imagined the Joker, if you really let him run free. The 'do I look like I have a plan' exchange with Dent was wonderful writing, as was most of the Joker's dialogue.
In the end there are two camps I guess - those who see the comics, etc. as cannon, and those like me who see them as containing interesting elements but lacking the maturity to fully develop those elements.
Batman I think is particularly ripe for this, and the more recent (compared to his origins) graphic novels and films (well, the first 2 Buton films and Nolan's two films) have really tapped into this.
Not that I'm arguing which is better. Just that for me I prefer the Joker as shown in Dark Knight, I prefer Batman as realized in those films, with a plausible Batmobile, etc. as well as Alan Moore's Killing Joke and Arkham Asylum (the graphic novel).
The Batman game though really did impress me. I got it on a whim and after feeling the demo showed promise. The game really surprised me with just how well it was put together and the love for its subject. It's a 92% title for me - tiny flaws here and there only, easily overlooked in light of how great everything else is.
The game seemed to me to be an amalgam of multiple Batman strands - it has huge elements of the AA graphic novel, lots of nods to Nolan's incarnation, yet also draws heavily on earlier Batman lore as well as other graphic novels such as The Killnig Joke - which if I remember correctly contained Barbara getting shot and crippled by Joker.
I'm actually impressed that, with so many influences, AA as a title is remarkably consistent in tone and content.
|
Well, I certainly can't consider myself one of the latter, I suppose, if only because it implies that the movies are a source of more mature storytelling - and they aren't. They never have been. Batman Begins has always been in the shadow of Year One in the same way that Dark Knight will continue to be in the shadow of Killing Joke, and I can't think of many graphics novels with better thematic expoundment than the Arkham Asylum novel.
For my money, Paul Dini tends to be Batman's best writer in both comics and in animation - him being the one who wrotes Batman: The Animated Series, which was less concerned with realism than it was with honesty, which I think still makes it the best depiction of the character, bar none. Dini also writes the best Joker, for my money: the Christmas issue from a year or two back stands as my testament to this statement. Joker's conversation with the crew at McDonald's is priceless and genuinely funny.
Paul Dini was a very large part of what made AA work, for me.
AA's biggest advantage, like the aninmated series, is that it never took itself too seriously: it was what it was, and it would try to be excellent within those confines, but it was not going to try to change the definition of the genre. That was my only concern with Dark Knight: somewhere in its attempts to be good, Nolan's movie seemed to forget that its core idea is still very silly, and came across a bit like a child walking around in its parent's shoes. But, that is me.
I think we are generally in agreement on most of these things, save in the ranking of importance and relevance (or, I suppose, quality) we give to these different depictions.