By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Article : Why Batman Arkham Asylum OUTDOES the Movies!! (agree or disagree)

On topic, (and I'm I've said this before) other than the Joker's awesome scenes that I could watch all day long, the overall movie was bad, long, boring. The voice of Batman was embarassing,



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

Around the Network

Actually I like more the ones with Michael Keaton.



Both the new batman movies and this new game is awesome. This game is the restart of batman games like batman begins was a reboot of the movies.. Christian bales voice can be sort of overkill when hes in batman mode but other than that .. both are awesome.



Check out my game about moles ^

I just wondered: Has Mark Hamill become "the Guy who does the Joker's Voice" yet ? :D

 

Edit: Opposed to "Luke Skywalker"



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Reasonable said:
^^
It was just the way I imagined the Joker, if you really let him run free. The 'do I look like I have a plan' exchange with Dent was wonderful writing, as was most of the Joker's dialogue.

In the end there are two camps I guess - those who see the comics, etc. as cannon, and those like me who see them as containing interesting elements but lacking the maturity to fully develop those elements.

Batman I think is particularly ripe for this, and the more recent (compared to his origins) graphic novels and films (well, the first 2 Buton films and Nolan's two films) have really tapped into this.

Not that I'm arguing which is better. Just that for me I prefer the Joker as shown in Dark Knight, I prefer Batman as realized in those films, with a plausible Batmobile, etc. as well as Alan Moore's Killing Joke and Arkham Asylum (the graphic novel).

The Batman game though really did impress me. I got it on a whim and after feeling the demo showed promise. The game really surprised me with just how well it was put together and the love for its subject. It's a 92% title for me - tiny flaws here and there only, easily overlooked in light of how great everything else is.

The game seemed to me to be an amalgam of multiple Batman strands - it has huge elements of the AA graphic novel, lots of nods to Nolan's incarnation, yet also draws heavily on earlier Batman lore as well as other graphic novels such as The Killnig Joke - which if I remember correctly contained Barbara getting shot and crippled by Joker.

I'm actually impressed that, with so many influences, AA as a title is remarkably consistent in tone and content.

Well, I certainly can't consider myself one of the latter, I suppose, if only because it implies that the movies are a source of more mature storytelling - and they aren't. They never have been. Batman Begins has always been in the shadow of Year One in the same way that Dark Knight will continue to be in the shadow of Killing Joke, and I can't think of many graphics novels with better thematic expoundment than the Arkham Asylum novel.

For my money, Paul Dini tends to be Batman's best writer in both comics and in animation - him being the one who wrotes Batman: The Animated Series, which was less concerned with realism than it was with honesty, which I think still makes it the best depiction of the character, bar none. Dini also writes the best Joker, for my money: the Christmas issue from a year or two back stands as my testament to this statement. Joker's conversation with the crew at McDonald's is priceless and genuinely funny.

Paul Dini was a very large part of what made AA work, for me.

AA's biggest advantage, like the aninmated series, is that it never took itself too seriously: it was what it was, and it would try to be excellent within those confines, but it was not going to try to change the definition of the genre. That was my only concern with Dark Knight: somewhere in its attempts to be good, Nolan's movie seemed to forget that its core idea is still very silly, and came across a bit like a child walking around in its parent's shoes. But, that is me.

I think we are generally in agreement on most of these things, save in the ranking of importance and relevance (or, I suppose, quality) we give to these different depictions.



Around the Network

^^
I think for some he probably already has that moniker. I grew up with Star Wars, but particularly in the first Hamil's voice could grate a little.

But as Joker - wow. Could listen to him all day long. What impressed me was listening to his little jokes in the challenge rooms, and realizing that just the voice, with no visual of the Joker, completely conveyed the character nonetheless.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

I think Christopher Nolan took Batman to new heights by making those two movies, they are simply the best comic book movies of all time! My only problem with the movies is Christain Bale's voice as Batman which really sucks but other than that, he's awesome. AA is a fantastic game, one of my fav this generation, and that's partly because they took what was great about the movies, all the cool aspects, and moulded it into one fantastic game; things like going on top of gargoyles, the invisible predator, the fantastic combat; all these things were glorified by the movie and replicated in the game.