By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Perfect Dark Zero 2 - Microsoft's next big gun?

BrainBoxLtd said:
W29 said:

 Okay as choirsoftheeye agreed with me on my post. I'm entitled to my opinion. I don't give a rats ass about reviewers they do not judge the games I like. i don't listen to them. So you point of the post you did above is not even worth reading and taking into account. If you had a brain you will register that those are peoples opinions on the game not mine. I said I liked the games I listed. I didn't like Viva Pinata for the simple fact it was sort of like Sims, which I don't like.

So really your brain needs to get beefed up or you must have peanut because you only quoted that part of my post which you obviously didn't read the rest.


I read your entire post, I only quoted the part where you chose to insult me. You say you enjoyed every RARE game made for the XBOX platform, I point out the one you missed and ironically suggest it was the only good one. You insult me, then go on to state why you personally didn't like it.

I respond in suggesting a lot of people did prefer it over their titles and ask why was I insulted. You insult me again, say my point isn't worth reading, suggest I should understand these are opinions despite you attacking my own. Repeat what you already said, and the insult me yet again.

You don't trust reviewers, neither do I, hence why I said Game Rankings doesn't count for a lot, doesn't make your opinion anymore valid. You like those games more than Piñata, fine, I don't care, your entitled to that. I'm entitled to say Viva Piñata is the only Rare game since Conker's I've had any interest in, and that I find it ironic when trying to suggest Rare has still being going strong after them changing hands to Microsoft, you list every game but their mostly critically well received one as your point.

Also for anyone wondering, Goldeneye: Rouge Agent isn't a squeal to the original Goldeneye in anyway. EA named it that to get people to think that, but it's actually about some agent for Goldfinger, which is about a dozen James Bond movies away from Goldeneye. Think they stuck in a character from the original Goldeneye to try and establish a weak connection between the two. =P


Listen I'm calm dude, you seriously need to chill out. Let me slow the converation down so you can understand what happened.

W29: I liked Conker, Kameo, Grabbed by Ghoulies, PDZ

Brain Box: You missed Viva Pinata since that was the only good one

W29: I didn't like the game because it reminded me of Sims

Brainbox: The critics gave those games bad reviews

W29: I can care less about reviews they don't make me buy a game, I buy a game based on what I like. Then I said you completely didn' t read my post.

Brain Box: I read your whole post but you kept insulting and you agreed on some points.

W29: Okay I admit I did say some rather harsh words to you, my fought dude, but I'm trying to get my point across saying I don't give a sh*t about reviewers or sales. If I like the game I'm playing it. So don't bring reviews into the mix when discussing a game with me. Your entitled to your opinion and so am I.

Again my fought and I'm moving on and forgetting about this whole sh*t that happened.

 



Around the Network
ssj12 said:
W29 said:
@ssj12

No thats not a sequel, Rare didn't develop the game. EA took the license and made it themselves, which in my opinion not Rare work.

 other companies can make sequels and indirect sequel. Look at Call of Duty. 2 different devs, same publisher, same license. Its just the opposite of that, kind of. Same license, 2 different publishers and devs.


Again and Brain BoxLTD I wasn't the idiot that said GoldenEye: Rogue Agent was a sequel it was this dude right here that said it is. Thats a HUGE different scernario. Rare made the game it was good. Call of Duty made several sequels with other developers it was good. Goldeneye was meant to be with Rare cause they made Goldeneye tight.

This game could be huge, but days that an announcement of a new Rare game made me extatic are over, I admit feeling extatic after seeing the Banjo 3 trailer hehe...

They should get rid of the ZERO if they don't want critics of the first game to think it's more of the same. I'm silently hoping they will blow us away with videos that will be even more controversial than the Killzone 2 videos. Here's hoping...



      

   

 

mrstickball said:

However, Perfect Dark Zero DID suck. Rare needs to spend more time on VP, Banjo, and kid-friendly IPs, or a Goldeneye XBLA - not another PDZ game.

A Goldeneye XBLA game would fail.

If you think it would succeed then you don't understand why the original did so well.



W29 said:
ssj12 said:
W29 said:
@ssj12

No thats not a sequel, Rare didn't develop the game. EA took the license and made it themselves, which in my opinion not Rare work.

other companies can make sequels and indirect sequel. Look at Call of Duty. 2 different devs, same publisher, same license. Its just the opposite of that, kind of. Same license, 2 different publishers and devs.


 

Again and Brain BoxLTD I wasn't the idiot that said GoldenEye: Rogue Agent was a sequel it was this dude right here that said it is. Thats a HUGE different scernario. Rare made the game it was good. Call of Duty made several sequels with other developers it was good. Goldeneye was meant to be with Rare cause they made Goldeneye tight.

 no actually the 007 license flipped around to many times. Activition has it now. But UbiSoft, EA, Rare, and a few others had the license, its called a movie based franchise. A half way decent one too (as a whole GoldenEye being the best ever made in gaming history) . 



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network
ssj12 said:
W29 said:
ssj12 said:
W29 said:
@ssj12

No thats not a sequel, Rare didn't develop the game. EA took the license and made it themselves, which in my opinion not Rare work.

other companies can make sequels and indirect sequel. Look at Call of Duty. 2 different devs, same publisher, same license. Its just the opposite of that, kind of. Same license, 2 different publishers and devs.


 

Again and Brain BoxLTD I wasn't the idiot that said GoldenEye: Rogue Agent was a sequel it was this dude right here that said it is. Thats a HUGE different scernario. Rare made the game it was good. Call of Duty made several sequels with other developers it was good. Goldeneye was meant to be with Rare cause they made Goldeneye tight.

 no actually the 007 license flipped around to many times. Activition has it now. But UbiSoft, EA, Rare, and a few others had the license, its called a movie based franchise. A half way decent one too (as a whole GoldenEye being the best ever made in gaming history) . 


ya think?



Words Of Wisdom said:
mrstickball said:

However, Perfect Dark Zero DID suck. Rare needs to spend more time on VP, Banjo, and kid-friendly IPs, or a Goldeneye XBLA - not another PDZ game.

A Goldeneye XBLA game would fail.

If you think it would succeed then you don't understand why the original did so well.


Yeah I agree an Goldeneye XBLA would seriously not work. How will the graphics look? how would that even work?



W29 said:

 

Again and BrainBoxLtd I wasn't the idiot that said GoldenEye: Rogue Agent was a sequel

 I wasn't trying to suggest that you were, or that anyone would be an "idiot" for thinking it was a sequel. (It is called Goldeneye after all) I'm just lazy so instead of having multiple quotes in one post, I just threw it in for anyone wondering. =P



Oh cool, by the way ssj12 said it was a sequel.



I threw up a little in my mouth when I saw the headline. From the stand point of somebody who has followed the work of David Doak and company for nearly a decade now, I can only hope that this is just a rumor



______________________________

VGChartz forums: the new gamefaqs