MikeB said:
billsalias said: MikeB, what is your goal and is it worth this level of effort? Are you looking for a 400k adjustment to PS3? If you get it will it change anything?
I just do not see the point in complaining about an at most 2 percent difference in total lifetime sales that would not change anyone's view of how the market is behaving. |
This is a sales website, I like discussing perspectives on this in a calm and polite manner.
I don't understand what the problem is. I just shared my perspective, can't handle it, don't read it.
|
I don't have a problem, I was asking you a direct question and giving my opinion on the possible answer. Also, I am quite capable of handling anything you have to say just fine and your smugness serves only to diminish your credibility. I asked you a simple question, so instead of getting pissy lets discuss it.
What is your goal in claiming that "the 360 is usually well overtracked and the PS3 significantly undertracked. "
Do you think if this shift was recognized it would make any difference to the perceived market position of any of the consoles? By your own calculations the PS3 is about ~450k under tracked in total sales to date [edit: I do not believe this but I am accepting it to simplify the discussion]. My opinion is that the difference we are discussing is not significant enough to have any impact on perceived momentum or market position. The difference, even if applied only to Europe where the race is closest and only over the last year, would not overcome the gap between PS3 and 360, let alone the Wii.
Do you think that Ioi and his team are not aware of these number you are quoting and you are doing them a service to point them out? That would be either absurd or insulting depending on your perspective considering that one set of number they produced and the other have been posted in so many public forums, including here, that you would have to try to miss them.
Are you trying to discredit the numbers? If so the error you are claiming, ~2 percent of total sales, would seem to me to be exceptionally accurate by any reasonable persons standards so your claim would be counter productive to your goals.
Are you trying to sow fear and doubt without actually making any real valid point as an attempt to influence the general perception of the PS3 and Sony? If so the reasonable and well thought out responses you are getting from many people will probably ensure that only those predisposed to your way of thinking will fall for it.
This leads me to the reason I asked the question, all the possible logical explanations I could come up with for why you continue to argue the original point, that there is a significant and chronic under tracking of PS3 and/or over tracking of 360, seem to have been effectively countered. What goal am I missing that you still think you can achieve or are you just being stubborn and refusing to admit your original point has been refuted?