The idea is that it's the spirit behind the motion controls that made them successful. Motion controls haven't gotten the expanded audience interested in core titles (as Metroid Prime 3 can attest), yet traditionally controlled games like Animal Crossing did catch on (not ecstatically, but still caught on)

It's not about the Motion controls, it's about how the motion was applied, a lesson that Microsoft and Sony are going to have to learn, i think.

It's an unnecessary rant (since we all know the analysts are full of BS), but still an apt one from Malstrom. These analysts often forget history, or fail to properly grasp history.

So.... you don't agree ?

or you just don't like him....

I do agree with many of his points but I don't like the guy himself that much. He sounds like he thinks his word is the be all end all in the industry and practically mocks anyone else with an opinion different from his. His work could be a lot better if it wasn't so pretentious at times imo.

Actually a fairly good one from Malstrom. I have found a lot of his recent articles to filled with "holes" in the arguments but this is a rather good one. But I guess it's more of a critique rather than an argument so it should be quite enlightening.