By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - What's Holding Up Final Fantasy XIV For Xbox 360?

you never learn.

On Topic: I for one would not care if XIV went 360, White Knight will end up better due to the fact XIV is XI except more sexy.

 

White Knight offers new innovative gameplay and great near endless custom creation.

That and Demons Souls but ya get the point.

Why is everyone making such a big deal outta this?



Around the Network
JEDE3 said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
JEDE3 said:
Light Yagami said:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=75131

The Sony Fanboys Here Are Treating It As A Big Game. Can't Wait For The 360 Announcement Just To See The Sony Boys Downplay The Game.

you have no common sense. A. they are saying its the biggest announcement for E3 they arent saying much other than that about it. B. they are saying it'll go to the 360... you are just up-playing the game for the inevitable 360 announcement.

Glad to see that you atleast are aware of the Trenton's Epic Fail


LOL... trent didn't fail...

So you saw GTTV?...When Geoff asked three times in a row..."IS it Exclusive to the PS3" and Trenton refused to say it was not, while he knew it was not exclusive beyond maybe a few months..



 



Seraphic_Sixaxis said:

you never learn.

On Topic: I for one would not care if XIV went 360, White Knight will end up better due to the fact XIV is XI except more sexy.

 

White Knight offers new innovative gameplay and great near endless custom creation.

That and Demons Souls but ya get the point.

Why is everyone making such a big deal outta this?

If you don't care about FFXIV...why are you making a big deal about some other game you like better...? You always do that..



 



Always do that? don't know what you mean this is the first time i've quoted two rpgs that are pretty much made to be MMO's in an overall statment.

And i do care about it so ... huh? if its free, then i'll get it but if not then yeah your right but as for now its on my watch list.

and i didn't make a big deal outta anything, look at your thread and how it went and then you'll see "a big deal."



Had a thought about possible reasons.

MMO's require two things to run well - RAM or hard drive space (preferably both). This is due to the streaming nature of online aspects of the game and the need to "lock in" memory. PCs are able to use RAM and hardrive, the PS3 is able to use a harddrive but the 360 cannot due to its fractured SKUs. Similarly to the PS2 launch of FFXI, MS may be looking at a HD/FFXIV bundle, but this doesnt come cheap.

There also may be another solution that involves server based memory allocation, but that involves cross-platform play (Squeenix doesn't want to have multiple server platforms for 360/PS3). This is where the "Live" problem may be occurring.



Around the Network

great

a console timed exclusive without losing any $$$



Time to Work !

Zizzla_Rachet said:
KillerMan said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
KillerMan said:
CGI-Quality said:
KillerMan said:
MMO + console = Fail. MMO's need keyboard.

Maybe the PS3 version will support it, remember Unreal Tournament III? The PS3 is capabale of keyboard/mouse support if the developer chooses to impement it.


Yeah. With keyboard support it is playble on PS3 but X360 is different story...

Square got FFXI working on 360..What would stop them from getting FFXIV to work..and from what I hear...It will play almost the same


It will work but it is different story that is it enjoyable. Writing chat messages with pad is pain. So slow that it takes ages to write little longer message. (and chatting while playing is key features in MMO's.)

LOL!!!!

What Text?

Xbox 360 has Cross Game chat when your a Gold user..Why would I text anyone?...The game will only support text...But with Xbox 360 you can chat with people regardless what comm abilities the game has....

Have you ever played proper MMO?



Grooski said:
Had a thought about possible reasons.

MMO's require two things to run well - RAM or hard drive space (preferably both). This is due to the streaming nature of online aspects of the game and the need to "lock in" memory. PCs are able to use RAM and hardrive, the PS3 is able to use a harddrive but the 360 cannot due to its fractured SKUs. Similarly to the PS2 launch of FFXI, MS may be looking at a HD/FFXIV bundle, but this doesnt come cheap.

There also may be another solution that involves server based memory allocation, but that involves cross-platform play (Squeenix doesn't want to have multiple server platforms for 360/PS3). This is where the "Live" problem may be occurring.


MMOs are exempt from the HDD rules and the Gold requirments... meaning if you want to play FF11 or 14 on your 360 you would not have to have a disc or have a gold account... you will have to have a HDD that you can install the game on but it's less complicated than installing it on your PC.



Cueil said:
Grooski said:
Had a thought about possible reasons.

MMO's require two things to run well - RAM or hard drive space (preferably both). This is due to the streaming nature of online aspects of the game and the need to "lock in" memory. PCs are able to use RAM and hardrive, the PS3 is able to use a harddrive but the 360 cannot due to its fractured SKUs. Similarly to the PS2 launch of FFXI, MS may be looking at a HD/FFXIV bundle, but this doesnt come cheap.

There also may be another solution that involves server based memory allocation, but that involves cross-platform play (Squeenix doesn't want to have multiple server platforms for 360/PS3). This is where the "Live" problem may be occurring.


MMOs are exempt from the HDD rules and the Gold requirments... meaning if you want to play FF11 or 14 on your 360 you would not have to have a disc or have a gold account... you will have to have a HDD that you can install the game on but it's less complicated than installing it on your PC.

 

Yeah I don't think its the gold requirement, but it has to be something along the lines of memory addressing and cross-platform data if it's a Live issue.

I also think it'd be console suicide to start releasing games that divide the install base. Releasing games that cannot run on Arcades is asking for a lot of trouble unless they release with hard drive like the PS2 did. If they did that, the Arcade will become extremely unpopular.

Still, I hope they work it out as this game looks like it deserves everyone playing it.



Zizzla_Rachet said:
JEDE3 said:
Zizzla_Rachet said:
JEDE3 said:
Light Yagami said:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=75131

The Sony Fanboys Here Are Treating It As A Big Game. Can't Wait For The 360 Announcement Just To See The Sony Boys Downplay The Game.

you have no common sense. A. they are saying its the biggest announcement for E3 they arent saying much other than that about it. B. they are saying it'll go to the 360... you are just up-playing the game for the inevitable 360 announcement.

Glad to see that you atleast are aware of the Trenton's Epic Fail


LOL... trent didn't fail...

So you saw GTTV?...When Geoff asked three times in a row..."IS it Exclusive to the PS3" and Trenton refused to say it was not, while he knew it was not exclusive beyond maybe a few months..


so i guess MS failed by saying bioshock was exclusive. Lost planet. Dead Rising. ToV... ect ect.