By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Mass Effect 1 vs Mass Effect 2 - screenshots comparison

The alien girl turned from BLUE TO PURPLE!!!! AWSOME!!!!



Around the Network

 

 



piggychan said:

actually those textures are much higher than ME1 which I was dissappointed on a few characters...

 

This is my favorite pic in this entire thread.



most of those screenshots, i.e both asari, and both wrex pictures are both from mass effect 1, so no wonder you cant see a difference!



 

 

 

Chacron said:
most of those screenshots, i.e both asari, and both wrex pictures are both from mass effect 1, so no wonder you cant see a difference!

True. They just put Liara next to the Asari Council member lol.



Truth does not fear investigation

Around the Network
NightAntilli said:
Chacron said:
most of those screenshots, i.e both asari, and both wrex pictures are both from mass effect 1, so no wonder you cant see a difference!

True. They just put Liara next to the Asari Council member lol.

yea I thought that was weird... I was wondering why I seen it before..

 



Xoj said:
selnor said:
Xoj said:

most of the improvements are kinda textures things.
like R1--> R2.
thats why it's not that noticeable.

@selnor, in uncharted 2 detail it's king, seriously nathan drake even gets wet, and texture work in gears 2 it's second to none.

killzone 2 main focus in not their characters but the enviroments. and characters are simple mainy due 32 player matches.


Uncharted has great character models. But Mass Effect 2 character models are seriously detailed. See Thane here. Look at the textures.

U said mass effect one. NOT two.

look at the hair, the eyes, the lips, hell they are even "wet" and sweaty

and don't make bring gears!, cuz i have the pc version =)


The effects are great. But the actual character models are not as good. The texture work is less resolution and theres no pores or anything in the skin. Even Mass Effect 1 beats it. Check this out. ME1.

In Game ME1: Look at the texture work. It's 2nd to none on character models.



selnor said:
Xoj said:
selnor said:
Xoj said:

most of the improvements are kinda textures things.
like R1--> R2.
thats why it's not that noticeable.

@selnor, in uncharted 2 detail it's king, seriously nathan drake even gets wet, and texture work in gears 2 it's second to none.

killzone 2 main focus in not their characters but the enviroments. and characters are simple mainy due 32 player matches.


Uncharted has great character models. But Mass Effect 2 character models are seriously detailed. See Thane here. Look at the textures.

U said mass effect one. NOT two.

look at the hair, the eyes, the lips, hell they are even "wet" and sweaty

and don't make bring gears!, cuz i have the pc version =)


The effects are great. But the actual character models are not as good. The texture work is less resolution and theres no pores or anything in the skin. Even Mass Effect 1 beats it. Check this out. ME1.

In Game ME1: Look at the texture work. It's 2nd to none on character models.

they are small on the lips of elena, and humans are not reptiles they don't need tons of scales in their bodies, by contrast uncharted have also one of the best characters animations in the market, but the work in the Eyes, hair , dirt, sweat, in their face it's certainly impressive.

uncharted have eve more impressive enviroments.

you like textures, then look at Gears 2, or LittleBigPlanet.



Xoj said:
selnor said:
Xoj said:
selnor said:
Xoj said:

most of the improvements are kinda textures things.
like R1--> R2.
thats why it's not that noticeable.

@selnor, in uncharted 2 detail it's king, seriously nathan drake even gets wet, and texture work in gears 2 it's second to none.

killzone 2 main focus in not their characters but the enviroments. and characters are simple mainy due 32 player matches.


Uncharted has great character models. But Mass Effect 2 character models are seriously detailed. See Thane here. Look at the textures.

U said mass effect one. NOT two.

look at the hair, the eyes, the lips, hell they are even "wet" and sweaty

and don't make bring gears!, cuz i have the pc version =)


The effects are great. But the actual character models are not as good. The texture work is less resolution and theres no pores or anything in the skin. Even Mass Effect 1 beats it. Check this out. ME1.

In Game ME1: Look at the texture work. It's 2nd to none on character models.

they are small on the lips of elena, and humans are not reptiles they don't need tons of scales in their bodies, by contrast uncharted have also one of the best characters animations in the market, but the work in the Eyes, hair , dirt, sweat, in their face it's certainly impressive.

uncharted have eve more impressive enviroments.

you like textures, then look at Gears 2, or LittleBigPlanet.

That "wet and sweaty" is simply increasing reflection. The "dirt" is adding some low texture browinish feature on the skin texture. The skin is very bland and like it has been said before, it has no pores or anything like that. You said humans don't need scales blah blah, but look at this pic of shepard.. It shows a lot more detail on the face

 

Or this one:



Truth does not fear investigation

Lol...wet and sweaty or made of wax? You decide.



"Man is born free but is everywhere in chains" - Rousseau