By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Fat Princess? Downloads? Digital Copys...BIG PROBLEMS for gamers

darendt said:
greenmedic88 said:

Somehow considering resale value on a $15 game never really crossed my mind, but then I'm not one to sell a game for a handful of dollars unless I just want to dump it because it's that bad.

About $20 (about two movie tickets or a round of pints) is the point at which I almost don't care how much "value" in dollars per hour I get for my money if a game is playable enough for me to want to return to it more than a few times.

I prefer to buy DD PC games through Steam and resell value on any of them has never been a factor (although technically, licenses can be "gifted" to other Steam users), mainly because there really isn't much of a market for used PC games. At that point, people usually just steal them online.

What's nice about DD games (depending on the platform) is that you have access to them on any system if you are the type of person who owns several systems or often play on systems owned by someone else.

As for the PSN DD system, it's really easy to abuse the hell out of it (installing on five systems owned by five different users) making the games practically free if you have a decent PS3 network of friends. I'd say that SCE's system is generous to the point of being flawed.

So here is my question. It seams to me that noone has thought much about past this gen. When the PS4 comes out and you want to play your PS3 games that you downloaded, wouldnt you be screwed if you game shared to everyone? You wouldnt have any downloads left. Could be a problem when we get there for the people who decided to steal...share there games.

Not really considering they paid like $3 for fat princess they already gotten their value back at that time :)



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB

Around the Network

Fat Princess is awesome, and while I much prefer having tangible media but I have no problem with them going to DD if all people are going to do is sell the game to retailer, that does nothing but cut their profits as sell people buy new, so they get less money. I still don't think that we will have only downloadable games next gen, but I wouldn't be too happy if we did



DD only on a console would have its share of problems.

While I'm sure in 3-5 years, 1TB storage will be cheap and common to the point where swappable 1TB HDD cartridges or even chip based storage could be implemented at mass consumer prices, there's still the issue of bandwidth unless the assumption is that all next gen consoles will be broadband connected.

I have a hard time seeing something simple like a console absolutely requiring a broadband connection just to buy and play games, even several years into the future.

It would be a much harder sell for retailers, even with "DL code in a game box" forms of distribution. While I realize a lot of gamers like having a physical box to represent the games they purchase, an empty box is only slightly worse than PC game installation discs that serve no purpose once installed.

For the most part, DD only distribution works best with smaller games (PSN games, PSP games, etc.) for the time being and in many ways is actually better in terms of ease of distribution and cost control for lower budget, lower cost and lower sized games.

I don't think I'd really want game discs for $5, $10 or even $20 PSN sized games, but then I realize I've been a bit quicker than some to accept DD and media free gaming (still bullish on Steam).



Munkeh111 said:
Fat Princess is awesome, and while I much prefer having tangible media but I have no problem with them going to DD if all people are going to do is sell the game to retailer, that does nothing but cut their profits as sell people buy new, so they get less money. I still don't think that we will have only downloadable games next gen, but I wouldn't be too happy if we did

agree