By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Crysis vs UT3 PC specs

GranTurismo said:
The Minimum Requirements for both games are retarded, the game will be a slide show on those specs. BF:2142 is a slide show on comps greater then those min specs.

You are talking about EA...

I keep saying it, Crysis show a huge a detailed enviroment, UT is not making use of the same tecnique...



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."
Around the Network

Never underestimate Epic optimisation...!

I was playing the first Unreal Tournament with a celeron 300 and 32mo of ram lol



Epic does a decent job with their engines, but they aren't exactly the poster childs for efficiency.



Cannot wait to play this on Linux. I found some minimum requirements for Linux but I do not know how reliable they are:

http://www.tuxgames.com/details.cgi?&gameref=145

Minimum

2.2.x or better Linux kernel with glibc-2.1 or later and X-Windows (XFree86 3.3.5 or later)

2.8 GHz x86 Processor

512 MB Memory

3.5 GB Disk Space

Hardware Accelerated 3D Graphics card with 256 MB video memory



The specs for Crysis are lower than what I was expecting given how people have been raving you'll need a beast of a machine to run it. My brothers 2 year old machine, excluding his video card (which was the previous gen (6600) when he bought it anyway and has recently been replaced) is the recommended specs, and the PC wasn't even top of the range hardware when he bought it.

Anyone who has played Bioshock on PC already knows what to expect out of UT3 performance (since its the same engine).



Around the Network

Actually those specs aren't nearly that bad. My computer can't handle it but its over 5 yrs old and those specs don't exactly blow it away. In my opinion, computing power and requirements have leveled out a bit in the last few years.



Just for the record the folks who make the CryEngine (aka Crytek) have said many many times that they designed the engine from the ground up to scale the game as needed to make the game playable for the PC its running on. One of the recent quotes is "Crysis scales 2 to 3 years back and 1 to 2 years up, so its 5 years of scaling." This means that if we take the pessimistic view of this statement, your computer would have to be considered high end 3 years ago to play crysis.

So pretty much if you have a decent GeForce 6 series card or better you should be fine to play the game at low settings. Minimum specs are not expected to produce super results for any game and its no different with Crysis or even UT3.

If you want to constantly play the newest and the best its going to cost more. If you are content to stay with hardware for 3-5 years making minors upgrades when/if needed you can get by at a pretty reasonable price considering the other functions of a computer. This is no different than consoles, except you get choice with the PC. With a console you are locked into the hardware until the next generation, but you get development directly for your hardware as compensation for that loss of freedom.

As with most things in life its a trade off. You basically have three choices...
1) Console - Hardware locked in - Hardware Specific Development as consolation
2) Average PC - "Average" Hardware is a moving target - Hardware scalable as consolation
3) High End PC - Constantly Purchasing New Parts (12-24 month cycles) - The best of everything as consolation

If I could afford option 3 I would go with it instead of #2, but as it is I do just fine with 1 & 2. It's a personal choice so their isn't really a right answer...



To Each Man, Responsibility

nufan00,

Unreal Tournament came out back in the late 90's when PC developers were developing games for the mainstream PC gamer. Now PC developers only cater to the high-end gamer. This is the reason why more gamers are moving to consoles. At least their is a five year life cycle instead of six months to a year when new technology is available.

I'm just waiting for StarCraft 2.



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

http://www.hardgame2.com/index.php?zone=news&mod=noticia&id=35320

 

Low Quality

 

Medium Quality

High Quality

Very High Quality



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."