By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - On the origin of education: Evolution in British schools

This was quite an interesting article I read in the Guardian today, I honestly had no idea that primary education in Britain could leave evolution from the curriculum. That's quite a big aspect of science to miss out on when studying biology as it is one of the fundamental theories.

So what do you think, should evolution be taught in British primary schools or not?

I think, like it or not, Evolution is one of the main underlying theories in science and should be taught. It's like teaching maths without geometry or English without Shakespeare.

Source

On the origin of education

To deny the importance of teaching evolution is to fail to grasp a basic truth about children

Ed Balls received a letter this week from 26 of the country's leading scientists – including Richard Dawkins, Harry Kroto, John Sulston – warning of their concerns that the proposed new primary school science curriculum does not even mention evolution.

I was happy to add my name to the signatories. To omit evolution from the education of five- to 11-year-olds would be to miss a great opportunity. Children are often fascinated by fossils and wildlife. While many are too young to appreciate the concepts of "deep time" – that the Earth is some 4.6 thousand million years old – and the logical rigour of natural selection, they have powers of observation and a capacity to be engaged by the names and structures of organisms that put many adults to shame.

Some will be suspicious because the letter to the secretary of state for children, schools and families was organised through the offices of the British Humanist Association. And it's a coincidence (I think) that news of it emerged at the same time as many of us were being regaled by a breakfast TV clip of what are becoming known as "Richard Dawkins's atheist summer camps" – but I am strongly in favour of children being taught about evolution in school whether or not they or their parents have a religious faith.

The great majority of people with a religious faith successfully combine it with an acceptance of evolution, as I do. Nevertheless, there is a substantial minority – perhaps about 15% of people in the UK – who are creationists. The views of such people can be respected without us failing to teach evolution in schools. We do not want to go down the path followed by many schools in the US, where evolution doesn't get a look in.

This year is Darwin200, the bicentenary of the birth of Charles Darwin and the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species, his magnum opus and the most important biology book ever written. What many people don't realise is that the sorts of observations that led Darwin to accept evolution and come up with the theory of natural selection are just those that can be made by schoolchildren.

Indeed, the Wellcome Trust has funded some wonderful Darwin-related activities being undertaken this year by hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, of children. Kew has sent a treasure chest of activities to every state primary school as part of The Great Plant Hunt, and there are activities for secondary students, too.

Why do I feel so strongly that evolution should be a part of every child's education? In large measure it is because Darwin enables us to see ourselves in a new light. For all that we are the most special of species – with our unrivalled capacity for language, for thought, for morality and for reason – we are not wholly distinct from the rest of creation. We share a common ancestor with every mammal, with every animal; indeed, with every organism.

There doesn't have to be a link between an appreciation of this web of life and our behaviour towards our fellow creatures, but, thankfully, there often is. By now it's a truism that we live at a time of almost unparalleled species extinction. Seeing ourselves in an evolutionary light may yet help us slow this terrible trend.

And then an evolutionary perspective on life can help us more rigorously assess our strengths and our weaknesses. We are the product of a mechanism that puts us first – that's what natural selection is all about – but we also have the evolved capacities to seek after truth, beauty and goodness: that's what being human is all about. This should start in the primary classroom.

 



Around the Network

wtf?

we dont teach Evolution, wow, EPIC FAIL, what idiot thought that was a good idea?



This is only in primary education I don't think I was taught evolution until secondary education... and I've now got the Tree of Life hanging from my wall.

I don't think I missed out from not being taught evolution until secondary.



5-11?

Seems a tad early for evolution... I'd stick to more basic stuff at that young an age. 

Don't see too many kids that age understanding it.

There are more important biological issues to be taught then.  Personal ones.



SamuelRSmith said:
This is only in primary education I don't think I was taught evolution until secondary education... and I've now got the Tree of Life hanging from my wall.

I don't think I missed out from not being taught evolution until secondary.

Agreed, it is easier to comprehend and appreciate in later life, but I think it should be at least covered, even if it's only briefly (say for one or maybe two lessons). I mean we learn about the water cycle by year one and we have to know about invaders and settelers by year three and they are pretty important in their respective fields too.



Around the Network
highwaystar101 said:
SamuelRSmith said:
This is only in primary education I don't think I was taught evolution until secondary education... and I've now got the Tree of Life hanging from my wall.

I don't think I missed out from not being taught evolution until secondary.

Agreed, it is easier to comprehend and appreciate in later life, but I think it should be at least covered, even if it's only briefly (say for one or maybe two lessons). I mean we learn about the water cycle by year one and we have to know about invaders and settelers by year three and they are pretty important in their respective fields too.

However considering that many adults still can not effectively comprehend the theory it makes you wonder if this re-enforces the idea that there is little point in devoting any significant amount of time toward evolution dueing primary education, or if it's the lack of being informed of it at an early age.



I dont believe in Evolution its all lies!

Creation is the truth

 

OT: Yes people should learn about the origins of the world as soon as possible, they shouldn't be taught anything unless there is evidence to back it up.



it should at least be covered.

regardless of whether you agree with it or not, the theory of evolution plays an important role in biology as we know it today.



                                                                                                  

it was left out because evolution is racist.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

These scientists are prime examples of why this subject needs to be taught early. They are not even referring to the theory with proper language. Evolution is a misnomer, or a incorrect name used in place of a correct one. The theory is not Evolution. The theory is Natural Selection. The term Evolution is used in many sciences that are not even biological in nature. Darwin never coined the term, and frankly they should be correcting the misconception. Especially since Evolution is often confused with direction or intent.

As for the subject it is absolutely essential for young children to be familiarized with the theory. Not only is it the corner stone of many sciences, such as Biology, Immunology, Sanitation, Agriculture, Paleontology, Ecology, and Psychology. The laws governing natural selection can be applied to other scientific fields, and even fields such as History. The theory is nothing less then a entirely different perspective upon life. Denying it to a child is like depriving them of greater opportunities.

You might as well hold them down, and break one of their legs if your that intent on crippling them. To be afraid of a scientific theory is really to be afraid of opposition. That isn't about courage that is about cowardice. There is really no excuse to deprive children of what amounts to a Rosetta stone for natural science. The theory is rather simple, and its no more contradictory in the sense of religion then Uniformitarianism. How many educators aren't teaching that to kids in elementary schools.