I agree with many of the complaints in the article because they are legitimate gripes. For example I think charging for themes is ridiculous. I also think that if Xbox Live is going to have even more ads that they should be only for Silver members. And I'm not sure if he covered this but I think Microsoft should treat all third-parties the same. For example some got special permission for larger XBLA games or to release free content when others weren't allowed. Also of course Microsoft deserves a lot of the heat over hardware issues.
With that being said I don't agree with the statement that Microsoft had no right getting into the console gaming market. I think every company that wants to get into it has the right regardless of their original reasons. Also he seems oblivious to the fact that if it hadn't of been for Microsoft and its money many of the games he enjoys likely wouldn't exist, or at least in the form they're in, because they wouldn't have been economically feasible. Does anyone really think that people that have been attracted to HD gaming because of the 360's lower price points, especially the Xbox 360 Arcade, would have chosen the PS3 instead? As for those that would argue that the PS3 would have been cheaper without the Xbox 360 as competition please explain to me why Sony would have chosen not to go with Blu-Ray and the Cell processor, both of which were jointly developed by them and in which they had a stake in their respective successes.
Also I want to point out something that appears to be ignorance in the article. The Avatars were in development before the Wii came out and before Miis were even revealed. The fact that someone working for a video game website is oblivious to that fact is surprising. If you don't believe me just Google it. As for Natal why isn't he bashing Sony which is guilty of exactly the same thing, hell people still remember the Sixaxis right? Or how about Sony copying Xbox Live features? Hey if the original writer is going to bash Microsoft for copying the least he can do is give them credit for things they didn't copy like achievements, etc.
Anyways it's good that he got his anger out about Microsoft. I just wish he would have at least tempered his article instead of letting it be completely one-sided. I remember for example when my mother sent in a PS1 for repair because of a problem with the CD drive, a problem Sony refused to recognize as widespread, and in which we were charged around $100 for. We went on to have the same problem with not one but two other PS1s as well (we simply kept them on their side and later on opened them and voided our warranty to try to fix them rather than allow Sony to rip us off again). At least Microsoft finally admitted their mistakes, which while it doesn't excuse them, is still a hell of a lot better than never admitting them at all.











