By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Again, next year seems better for Ps3..

leatherhat said:
I agree with OP all sony has done this year is give us Killzone 2, Infamous, MLB 09, Uncharted 2, MAG, ratchet and clank, a dozen or so psn games and then on the psp side all they have given us is GT portable, jak and daxter, resistance retribution, loco roco 2, patapon 2 and a gew others. I mean come on sony is that all you can do? 25+ solid games in one year? By the end of the year microsoft will have delivered TWO WHOLE GAMES for xbox. Sony you need to take a page from them and start doing your consumers right. Also God of War in March? Thats almost 3 whole months after the fall lineup, I cant wait that long! And strong rumors of GT5 this year? Unblelievable- truly you have failed sony. And I dont even want to start on third party games for ps3 and psp.

1. He was being sarcastic.

2.MAG has been confirmed for next year.

3. It's sad thats u have to add psn and psp games to make a point.

4. MLB or NBA whatever shouldnt be counted as a game. In that case we might as well add the 2k and live series in.

5. Halo Wars, Halo ODST, Left 4 Dead 2, GTA 4 DLC ( yes it's at leats 10 hrs it's counts as a game), Star Ocean: The Last Hope,Ninja Blade( didnt like the game but it got decent reviews so I'm putting it on the list), Shadow Complex, Magna Carta 2,Splinter Cell: Convinction, Forza 3....is not just 2 whole games.

6. Stop being a Fanboy.....

 

 

btw...can I get an "Owned" Sign pls?

 



Around the Network

Year of the PS3 formula still in tact. current year + 1 = year of the PS3!!! OMG!1111!!!!!



I think it is nice that Sony announces their games many years in advance.. That just shows that they are willing to let their community know what they are working on and that their fans can follow the development. Like for instance, fans of the Forza series. I believe they had NO info or NO place to go to find out info or screens or anything about their upcoming game that they waited so long for. I don't think all this secret stuff is so good. I want to follow my games in development and know what the future bring so I can read and discuss about it on forums. I don't want the games I look forward to to be in the dark and then 3 months before release you get to know about it. I mean, I like surprises, and I think some games should be held secret, but not all. I love how Sony plays their hand...



every year is there year for the ps3 :) , when they keep saying it will be the year next year and so on, they where kinda right, it has got better year after year , and next year its only going to be better than the previous



Next year will e great for both PS3 and 360. Idsay PS3 has the edge but 360 will have Halo Reach, Mass Effect 2 and most likely Gears 3 all in one year not to mention other great exclusives. So ye2010 will be great for PS3 and 360.




Around the Network
bigdom2786 said:
leatherhat said:
I agree with OP all sony has done this year is give us Killzone 2, Infamous, MLB 09, Uncharted 2, MAG, ratchet and clank, a dozen or so psn games and then on the psp side all they have given us is GT portable, jak and daxter, resistance retribution, loco roco 2, patapon 2 and a gew others. I mean come on sony is that all you can do? 25+ solid games in one year? By the end of the year microsoft will have delivered TWO WHOLE GAMES for xbox. Sony you need to take a page from them and start doing your consumers right. Also God of War in March? Thats almost 3 whole months after the fall lineup, I cant wait that long! And strong rumors of GT5 this year? Unblelievable- truly you have failed sony. And I dont even want to start on third party games for ps3 and psp.

1. He was being sarcastic.

2.MAG has been confirmed for next year.

3. It's sad thats u have to add psn and psp games to make a point.

4. MLB or NBA whatever shouldnt be counted as a game. In that case we might as well add the 2k and live series in.

5. Halo Wars, Halo ODST, Left 4 Dead 2, GTA 4 DLC ( yes it's at leats 10 hrs it's counts as a game), Star Ocean: The Last Hope,Ninja Blade( didnt like the game but it got decent reviews so I'm putting it on the list), Shadow Complex, Magna Carta 2,Splinter Cell: Convinction, Forza 3....is not just 2 whole games.

6. Stop being a Fanboy....

 

btw...can I get an "Owned" Sign pls?

 

Just notice how (almost, maybe all) all the games leatherhat mentioned are games made by SONY and not 3RD PARTY devs... Sony delivers games made by themselves as well as 3rd party and does not rely on others doing the work for them. That is why I respect Nintendo and Sony, they don't rely too much on everyone else, they speak with their own creativity and development..

For me, Left 4 Dead, GTA DLC, Mass Effect, Star Ocean, Ninja Blade, Splinter Cell, Magna Carta and Shadow Complex have "nothing to do" with Microsoft at all. Those games would've / could've been made without the 360 existing at all. With the games and franchises that Sony and Nintendo make, there is a chance that they would've never existed at all. Valve would've made L4D, Star Ocean would've definetly been made, Rockstar could've made the DLC if they wanted (maybe not because of $50 million from MS), Splinter Cell is a series with roots on many consoles in the past (despite being an Xbox game originally), Magna Carta 2 is a sequel to a PS2 game I believe, and so on.. And if we dig deeper into the past, Capcom would've made Dead Rising and Lost Planet, Tales of Vesperia would've been made, possibly Eternal Sonata as well. Gears of War could've been made (maybe not, seeing as it is a typical game for the 360 fanbase), Mass Effect would've been made, Alan Wake would've been made, Rare games would've been made and actually be good... Hell, even HALO was supposed to be a game for Mac before MS made relations with Bungie. Almost EVERY game with ties to the 360 console would've been made without the console even existing.

Even though Nintendo is THE KING of franchises (even though they milk a lot, IMO) and have people like Miyamoto in their own ranks which I don't see Sony have within Sony Corp itself (if you know what I mean), Sony still creates new franchises and new game ideas WITHIN their own company and their studios. Most of their games are here today because of the actions of Sony and the creation of their studios.. Especially Nintendo games would've never seen the light of day if not for Nintendo being established. Sony is kind of in the middle because their studios are not directly from within Sony Corp, and there is a strong chance the games would've been made either way... Anyways, this is what makes the big difference between the big 3, and as long as MS keeps relying heavily on 3rd party, this will not change IMO.

For me, and I am possibly a minority but I don't really care, Forza, Fable, Kameo and probably some others are the only games that would've not been made without the 360. Sorry, there are probably a couple of more games (like that avatar racing game and 1 vs 100), but I have a really hard time remembering games from within MGS.. There really aren't that many titles that MICROSOFT themselves has brought to the table... A little sad actually for such a big software company.

this is all my opinion, in a wall of text.. sorry if you don't like it, then i will cry....

why would you want and "Owned" sign? So you could own yourself?

ps: sorry for double post



^erm all those sony games could also have been made if sony weren't around. Those dev houses would simply make a game on a different platform. Remember how sony got those studios?
By buying them also games like K2 and uncharted are made by studios that choose to make exclusives.

Without sony those games would still be here.

Only Nintendo can the point your poorly trying to make about sony games be true for.
Without Ninty (and Sega when they was making hardware) most of their franchises and games not exist but for Sony and MS their exclusives would be elsewhere.



double post



yeah maybe lol i dont know soryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy



akuseru said:
I think it is nice that Sony announces their games many years in advance.. That just shows that they are willing to let their community know what they are working on and that their fans can follow the development. Like for instance, fans of the Forza series. I believe they had NO info or NO place to go to find out info or screens or anything about their upcoming game that they waited so long for. I don't think all this secret stuff is so good. I want to follow my games in development and know what the future bring so I can read and discuss about it on forums. I don't want the games I look forward to to be in the dark and then 3 months before release you get to know about it. I mean, I like surprises, and I think some games should be held secret, but not all. I love how Sony plays their hands.

Ummm... Forza has been known since May which gives it a good 5 months. There's a difference between announcing a game years in advance and announcing a game making a release window ( wasn't GT5 orginally a launch title?). And its was more than obivous that Forza 3 was gonna be release. Of course fanboys tend to be blind and only see what they wanna see. I'm pretty sure if MS wasn't confident that FOrza 3 is gonna deliver they wouldn't announced it the way they did... same goes for Crackdown 2...which oh look has a 8 month - a year promo period.