By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - inFamous has still way worser graphics than Gta Iv..

Hmmm i was thinking the opposite today while playing Infamous. I thought GTAIV looked worse, horrible anti-alising, still has the "boxy" look of characters and car models.



Around the Network

I didnt even want to comment on this thread, Because comparing a hundred million dollar budget game to a low budget game like infamous is just sad. And for the record infamous is breathtaking and they worked really hard on it, it wasnt meant to be realstic it was meant to be comic book like.

oh yeah did i mention that infamous cant run on 360, too powerful for it.



NEVER_SAY_DIE_00 said:
I didnt even want to comment on this thread, Because comparing a hundred million dollar budget game to a low budget game like infamous is just sad. And for the record infamous is breathtaking and they worked really hard on it, it wasnt meant to be realstic it was meant to be comic book like.

oh yeah did i mention that infamous cant run on 360, too powerful for it.


But did I mention that GTA IV can run on the 360?

*licks the blood off the knife that backstabbed the SDF*



Akvod said:
NEVER_SAY_DIE_00 said:
I didnt even want to comment on this thread, Because comparing a hundred million dollar budget game to a low budget game like infamous is just sad. And for the record infamous is breathtaking and they worked really hard on it, it wasnt meant to be realstic it was meant to be comic book like.

oh yeah did i mention that infamous cant run on 360, too powerful for it.


But did I mention that GTA IV can run on the 360?

*licks the blood off the knife that backstabbed the SDF*

well rockstar kept complaining that they were very limited with what they can do because of the 360, and that explains why microsoft  had to bribe rockstar 50million dollars just so they can get some exclusive dlc, and it also explains why gta4 is the least fun gta of them all.

owned owned owned.



NEVER_SAY_DIE_00 said:
Akvod said:
NEVER_SAY_DIE_00 said:
I didnt even want to comment on this thread, Because comparing a hundred million dollar budget game to a low budget game like infamous is just sad. And for the record infamous is breathtaking and they worked really hard on it, it wasnt meant to be realstic it was meant to be comic book like.

oh yeah did i mention that infamous cant run on 360, too powerful for it.


But did I mention that GTA IV can run on the 360?

*licks the blood off the knife that backstabbed the SDF*

well rockstar kept complaining that they were very limited with what they can do because of the 360, and that explains why microsoft  had to bribe rockstar 50million dollars just so they can get some exclusive dlc, and it also explains why gta4 is the least fun gta of them all.

owned owned owned.

Nope, you're still owned because your point was that inFamous, a graphically inferior game, was impossible to be done on the 360, when a graphically superior game, GTA IV, was able to be done on the 360.

If it's a matter of hardware and it's ability, then I've proved my point, bribe or no bribe, 50 million or none, GTA IV was able to be done on the 360, money can't change reality (the 360's specs).

But ya, GTA IV sucked balls in terms of gameplay.



Around the Network

It'd be nice to see the next GTA developed on ps3 then converted to 360, (like FFXIII) this way the ps3 doesnt have to take yet another inferior port from an technically aging system.



limelight022 said:
It'd be nice to see the next GTA developed on ps3 then converted to 360, (like FFXIII) this way the ps3 doesnt have to take yet another inferior port from an technically aging system.

2 things:

1) Why did u bring up a month old thread to troll?

2) You see why he got the banhammer...would u like the same?



your grammar is more "worser" than myne



inFamous is a truely 3D game, where as it GTA4 you're stuck on the ground. (Atleast when I played I never got to go in the air, only played about 1/2 way through though)

So the technical challenges of having to load an ENTIRE city for when you are in the air (inFamous), and just loading a few buildings at a time (GTA4) are great.

And as many have said the budgets and overall time spent on the two differ greatly.

Graphics can make a game more enjoyable, but they do not make the game.



i dont know what type of tv, or res your playing the game on, but infamous graphics was great, far better then prototype. so i highly disagree. graphics were far better the grand theft auto, not taking anything away from the game, gta  great game. and so is infamous, game play and graphics